I think you need to be a bit more precise...
The Windows 2008 R2 Server initiates the connection? (this I suspect it not the
case)
Normally, when we say 'x talks to y', it is 'x' that initiates the connection.
So, if the Win7 client is initiating the connection to the Windows Server 2008
R2 ser
Nope, but I am having problems with KB2604110 and KB2656407 being repeatedly
offered to my XP box.
Cheers,
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Infrastructure Engineer
Hoople Ltd | Thorn Office Centre | Hereford HR2 6JT
Tel: 01432 260415 | Email: phil.ran...@hoopleltd.co.uk
From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:chr
NO worries..
Z
Edward Ziots
CISSP, Security +, Network +
Security Engineer
Lifespan Organization
ezi...@lifespan.org
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 11:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Firewall-y stuff
That's pretty much
That's pretty much the config we're looking like recommending for this
particular app to function.
Cheers for the help,
JR
On 9 May 2012 16:34, Ziots, Edward wrote:
> I would have to say 80,443,1433 TCP allow on the fw rule from Windows 7
> side of the FW to only to the Windows 2008 box. (
Still in testing here, but Sue Bradley posted the issue on one of the
security lists I am on.
Are there special **requirement**s related**to apply**ing**the
**security update packages that address**CVE-2012-0181**?* Yes. The
detection logic for the security update package identified as
KB2686
I would have to say 80,443,1433 TCP allow on the fw rule from Windows 7
side of the FW to only to the Windows 2008 box. (Could be different if
you set a port different than 1433 TCP for SQL. Pretty easy to filter
with wireshark to determine just what is needed.
Z
Edward Ziots
CISSP, Sec
Anyone have issues rolling this one out?
http://www.askwoody.com/2012/problem-with-ms12-034-kb-2676562-patch/
Christopher Bodnar
Enterprise Achitect I, Corporate Office of Technology:Enterprise
Architecture and Engineering Services
Tel 610-807-6459
3900 Burgess Place, Bethlehem, PA 18017
Bit of both. We need a Windows 2008 R2 Server to talk to Windows 7 clients
that are on the other side of a firewall, using SQL and BITS traffic
On 9 May 2012 15:54, Ziots, Edward wrote:
> Are we talking a regular firewall or the Windows firewall on a server? ***
> *
>
> ** **
>
> Z
>
> ** **
Cheers
On 9 May 2012 15:52, Ziots, Edward wrote:
> I believe you need both 80/443 outbound opened if you are going to allow
> http/https. So its two ports.
>
> ** **
>
> Z
>
> ** **
>
> Edward Ziots
>
> CISSP, Security +, Network +
>
> Security Engineer
>
> Lifespan Organiza
That's correct, i forgot to mention that is for 2012, however as it's
licensed by cores it will allow you to have up to 16 VM's on the physical
server.
Stefan
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Ziots, Edward wrote:
> download.microsoft.com/.../*2008*%20*sql*%20licensing%20overview...
>
> Show
Thanks for the clarification Chris
On 9 May 2012 15:52, Christopher Bodnar wrote:
> Yes, just the one port. It's easier to think of BITS as a sub-component of
> IIS. So if your IIS communication is working over 80 or 443, you should be
> good to go.
>
> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library
Are we talking a regular firewall or the Windows firewall on a server?
Z
Edward Ziots
CISSP, Security +, Network +
Security Engineer
Lifespan Organization
ezi...@lifespan.org
From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 10:53 AM
To: N
I believe you need both 80/443 outbound opened if you are going to allow
http/https. So its two ports.
Z
Edward Ziots
CISSP, Security +, Network +
Security Engineer
Lifespan Organization
ezi...@lifespan.org
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09,
Yes, just the one port. It's easier to think of BITS as a sub-component of
IIS. So if your IIS communication is working over 80 or 443, you should be
good to go.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc732428.aspx
Christopher Bodnar
Enterprise Achitect I, Corporate Office of Technology:
I'm in no way a networking kind of guy, so please excuse this slightly
noob-ish question...if you need to open up a firewall for http/s and BITS
traffic, since they both work on port 80 (or 443), do you just need to open
the one port? I can't seem to find a definitive answer via the Google-God
Che
download.microsoft.com/.../2008%20sql%20licensing%20overview...
Shows that Licensing is still per-processor ( not core) on SQL 2008 R2,
and previous versions.
In SQL 2012 its per-core see below:
http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/en/us/get-sql-server/how-to-buy.aspx
Z
Edward Ziots
CIS
I just looked at a forum post which suggested that when the TS Session
Broker is using DNS entries for each farm server, you can't connect to the
TS servers by hostname unless you use the /admin switch
Haven't had any feedback since I suggested that though
On 9 May 2012 13:58, Andrew S. Baker wr
Yeah, but small fonts use less bandwidth.
From: James Hill [mailto:falc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 4:02 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: r...@walkermartyn.co.uk - Re: r...@walkermartyn.co.uk - Re: Which
Server In A TS Farm? - Found word(s) farm in the subject - Found wo
What happens if you use mstsc.exe with the /console or /admin switch?
e.g. mstsc /v *servername */admin
On 9 May 2012 10:02, James Hill wrote:
> Maybe it’s having difficulty reading the name/ip entered due to the font
> size so it takes a guessa and hence you get a random result.
>
> ** **
Maybe it's having difficulty reading the name/ip entered due to the font
size so it takes a guessa and hence you get a random result.
From: Robert Jackson [mailto:r...@walkermartyn.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, 9 May 2012 6:31 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: r...@walkermartyn.co.uk - Re:
So you are using a standard RDP client, and when you type a server name in
it redirects you to a different server? Why on earth would it do that? I
could understand this if you were using some load balancing mechanism such
as connecting to a published application rather than a server name, but
that
Same thing.
From: Rankin, James R [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday 09 May 2012 09:10
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: r...@walkermartyn.co.uk - Re: r...@walkermartyn.co.uk - Re: Which
Server In A TS Farm? - Found word(s) farm in the subject - Found word(s)
farm in the subject
Why not proxy the mail to something else that will forward to the SBS
server when it is back online?
You could have just had email down.
Good job on the customer service, though.
-ASB: http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker
Sent from my Motorola Droid RAZR
On May 9, 2012 2:37 AM, "David Lum" wrote:
>
Eh? What if you use the name?
---Blackberried
-Original Message-
From: "Robert Jackson"
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 09:07:20
To: NT System Admin Issues
Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues"
Subject: RE: r...@walkermartyn.co.uk -
Re: Which Server In A TS Farm? - Found word(s) farm in the subject
I thought I may be missing something, but not that obvious. If I RDP
based on the physical IP address of the server I want to log in on, I
potentially may be redirected to another server in the Farm (I've tried
this so I know).
From: Rankin, James R [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent:
And I thought I was missing something
From: Rankin, James R [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 12:47 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Which Server In A TS Farm?
Er, try RDP direct to your server of choice?
---Blackberried
___
Er, try RDP direct to your server of choice?
---Blackberried
-Original Message-
From: "Robert Jackson"
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 08:32:41
To: NT System Admin Issues
Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues"
Subject: Which Server In A TS Farm?
Within a Terminal Services Farm, is it possible to sp
Within a Terminal Services Farm, is it possible to specify which server
to log in to? As an Administrator, I may want to log into a specific
server in the TS Farm to check log files, AV updates etc.
Regards,
Rab.
=
Robert Jackson
28 matches
Mail list logo
