I can agree with that, I am in a unique situation where I am deploying a
completely new infrastructure and have decided to deploy everything on Server
2012. All and all I have been very happy with 2012.
Cheers
Ryan
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Wednesday, Sep
No... doesn't even make good sense for them to do so.
Companies, at least those with some level of operational maturity, need to have
a chance to begin testing a deployment of a new server OS and evaluating it
before they begin the process of putting critical business applications on that
new o
I would of thought they would have had all the service packs ready when they
released Server 2012 but maybe I am just trying to push the envelope a bit too
quickly.
From: Heaton, Joseph@DFG [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 2:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subjec
He is just pulling cable but I imagine it will be inspected by an inspector
to make sure it installed to meet whatever the low voltage wiring code is.
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
> True enough. I didn't catch that.
>
> However, is he actually installing a structured cabling
And he is really nice guy to boot.
He knows more cisco than I'd ever dream of trying to learn.
Hate that he left his previous gig as I could call him any time for advice. I
think now he'd have to charge for it.
From: Shane Mullins [mailto:tsmulli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 8:
I know old thread but it is relevant to a project I am now.
> I've been discussing it offline with Brian D and he said he had reached out to
> someone, he has a pretty long reach so I expect some better answers are
> forthcoming. :-)
Did any "better answers" come forth?
Thanks
Carl Webster
Con
True enough. I didn't catch that.
However, is he actually installing a structured cabling system, to a
specific standard?
Or is he just pulling cable?
If the latter, then the CableIQ unit might be all you need.
Kurt
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:02 PM, James Kerr wrote:
> Ruh oh, that $1600 unit
Give him Kevin’s new book Ghost In The Wires and he’s be hooked for life…
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 12:37 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Pen test vendors
My 19yr old is a computer geek wannabe (he has done misc. work for me and pic
Tell him to be an air traffic controller. Less stress and the hours are
better! ☺
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 11:37 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Pen test vendors
My 19yr old is a computer geek wannabe (he has done misc. work for
Then he could be a 'personailty' and talk about random stuff and still make
money.
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Jonathan Link wrote:
> The only danger there is that he might get pulled into Steve Gibson and
> Leo Laporte land...
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:37 PM, David Lum wrote:
>
>>
The only danger there is that he might get pulled into Steve Gibson and Leo
Laporte land...
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:37 PM, David Lum wrote:
> My 19yr old is a computer geek wannabe (he has done misc. work for me
> and picks stuff up QUICK). Today I asked if he was serious about wanting to
>
My 19yr old is a computer geek wannabe (he has done misc. work for me and picks
stuff up QUICK). Today I asked if he was serious about wanting to be an IT guy
like me, to which he replied in the affirmative. I told him his first task is
to “Tell me who Kevin Mitnik is, list some things he’s done
Hee hee!
He’s been a (very) successful security consultant since 2000,
and he’s a real business partner of mine in KnowBe4. Great
guy to work with too. We wrote the Kevin Mitnick Security
Awareness Training together over an 8 month period.
Stu
From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:ezi...@lifespan.org]
S
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:15 AM, KenM wrote:
> With Quest
>
> get-qadmemberof USERNAME | Select name, notes
Well, THAT was stunningly easy! LOL Thanks. That will make the report
a whole lot easier, I think ...
I will have to read up on these Quest addins
~ Finally, powerful endpoint secu
I had a domain user account added to local admin group. Not good
enough.
I logged off and back on as domain admin and the dism command worked.
Thanks all.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Posted At: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 9:55 AM
Posted To: itli...@imcu.c
With Quest
get-qadmemberof USERNAME | Select name, notes
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Michael Leone wrote:
> I have this request to list all the groups a specific set of users
> belong to. Since we use groups to control ACLs, this can (effectively)
> be a listing of all the shared folders
With the Quest CMDLets this works:
get-qaduser jdoe -properties memberof|select -expandProperty
memberof|get-qadgroup|select name,notes
Christopher Bodnar
Enterprise Architect I, Corporate Office of Technology:Enterprise
Architecture and Engineering Services
Tel 610-807-6459
3900 Burgess P
Rent one, or if you're serious about doing this kind of work on the
side as a revenue-enhancer, buy one anyway and write it off on your
taxes as a professional expense. The Fluke CableIQ line is very nice,
and fairly reasonable on price - about $1600US at Provantage
:http://www.provantage.com/fluke
I have this request to list all the groups a specific set of users
belong to. Since we use groups to control ACLs, this can (effectively)
be a listing of all the shared folders the user has access to (we list
the location of the shared folder in the notes of the group). I'm
still new to PS, and co
You can rent the tester, just find out how much it will cost and add that
into your price. http://www.atecorp.com/Manufacturers/Fluke.asp
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:44 AM, James Kerr wrote:
> I don't have the cash to buy the tester to certify. I just have the basic
> everything in the right place
It isn't cheap. Usually not the best choice for a smaller company. As ASB
mentioned there is Tripwire as well. I use both products and there is some
overlap with functionality. I consider Tripwire more of a compliance tool,
as where Varonis is more of an auditing tool. I think DataAdvantage woul
Then just don't do it.
From: James Kerr [mailto:cluster...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 8:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Side Job Pricing
I don't have the cash to buy the tester to certify. I just have the basic
everything in the right place and connected tester.
+1
From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonmobility.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 5:53 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Side Job Pricing
I'd be very cautious of this scenario.
You're going to have 2 different parties involved (1 running the cable, 1
terminating
I'd be very cautious of this scenario.
You're going to have 2 different parties involved (1 running the cable,
1 terminating)
With 300 drops... when (not if) there is a problem later, there is the
potential for a lot of finger-pointing.
Especially if the runs are not certified and signed off o
24 matches
Mail list logo
