I thought I fixed the problem by adding SYSTEM = full control to the \profiles
directory, but it didn't. All the directories that get created are empty and the
perms on them are as follows:
server\administrators = full control
system = full control
The default user all users
The %SystemRoot%\profiles permissions are set to everyone = full control as one of the
MS Q articles said they should be. One of the servers had everyone set to read and
authenticated users set to full control; I fixed that but it didn't fix the problem.
Each profile directory under that
I have checked items 1 and 2. I'm not quite sure what you mean by item 3. Can you
give me a little more info?
Thanks, Michelle
-Original Message-
From: xylog [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 7:57 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NT 4.0 Profiles
Not using any quota products. The logged on user is using a local profile. One of the
problem servers is the Exchange server and the other is our Intranet server. I
checked the local security database on the Exchange server and everyone is granted
bypass traverse checking. I checked the
NT 4.0, SP6a.
In the %SystemRoot%\Profiles directory on two of my servers, a TON of directories
called system.### and temp.### keep getting created. I assume it has something to do
with the event ID 1000's[1] that I am getting in the event logs, but I have not been
able to find any useful
No, I usually have better luck searching the TechNet CDs. But I suppose I should give
it a try.
-Original Message-
From: Gisler, Johnny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 5:06 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NT 4.0 Profiles event ID 1000
Your usin
The A Virtual Card for You is a hoax. You will find it listed on most AV sites.
-Original Message-
From: Sabrina Stolcz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 1:18 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: WORST EVER VIRUS (CNN announced)
WORST EVER VIRUS (CNN
If you have security auditing turned on, that would cause the drives to be active. We
got one of our servers back from ATT and I thought we might have some type of disk
problem because the drives were cranking all the time. Tuned out that they had
security auditing turned on for EVERYTHING.
NT 4, IIS 4.
Does anyone know what Microsoft considers a connection in IIS? Is each
unique user a connection or is something else being measured to determine
current connections?
We have the HTTP Keep Alives turned off and max connections is set to 500.
At one point the active connections were
It will simply be data storage for our production department - GBs of crap,
I mean, very important files. I'll check out your link.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 6:27 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Cc: [EMAIL
Title: Message
That's
too funny. I do at least know Hardware RAID is better than Software
RAID. And if NT will allow me to duplex, as it was suggested by someone
else, then that's probably what I'll do.
-Original Message-From: Flanagan, Kevin
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent:
Title: Message
That
is very true and if I can't get the money to purchase a RAID
controller,software is the way I'll have to go. Hopefully I will be
able to convince them and/or I'll have to use one of my tricks for staying under
the limit that requires approval. ;-)
-Original
Title: Message
Good
idea. Thanks.
-Original Message-From: Kevin Lundy
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001
10:52 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Hard
drive configuration
Try
a ROI calculation. HW Raid controllers aren't as expensive as
I currently have a NetWare server with 6 Seagate ST39175LW drives on 2
Adaptec controllers in a duplexed configuration. We are going to rebuild
the server as NT 4.0. I don't think NT can mirror the drives in a duplexed
configuration like the one we currently have. Am I wrong. If not, what
14 matches
Mail list logo
