; http://TheEssentialExchange.com <http://theessentialexchange.com/>
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, September 12, 2011 1:45 PM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Another high profile breach
>
>
System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Another high profile breach
Is anyone going to forget he did that? Still funny but...
Jon
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Webster
mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com>> wrote:
Would that equate to someone sending a complete router or firewall config with
I
ster
>> Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
>> http://www.CarlWebster.com <http://www.carlwebster.com/>****
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
>> > Sent: Thursday,
ilto:jk.har...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 08, 2011 5:55 PM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Another high profile breach
>
> ** **
>
> Is anyone going to forget he did that? Still funny but...
>
>
>
> Jon
>
> O
> Is anyone going to forget he did that?
Probably not. It remains a classic example of the Ron White quote Ben provide
earlier today.
From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 5:55 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Another high profile breach
>
> Carl Webster
> Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
> http://www.CarlWebster.com
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 1:52 PM
> > To: NT System Adm
rofessional
> http://www.CarlWebster.com
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 1:52 PM
>> To: NT System Admin Issues
>> Subject: Re: Another high profile breach
>>
>&
; From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 1:52 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Another high profile breach
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Andrew S. Baker
> wrote:
> > http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/09/us/09br
It was just discovered. The spreadsheet had from what the article said been
posted there for about a year. That was bad enough but for a PATIENT to
find the spreadsheet not that is real bad and just plain wrong. Who at
Stanford was making sure this did not happen and why are they still employed
urity +
Security Engineer
Lifespan Organization
Email:ezi...@lifespan.org
Cell:401-639-3505
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 2:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Another high profile breach
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/09/us/09breach
Well, the spreadsheet was from Sept. 9, 2010, so maybe that had something to do
with it.
And we wonder why newspapers are going out of business...
>>> Ben Scott 9/8/2011 11:51 AM >>>
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Andrew S. Baker wrote:
> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/09/us/09breach.html
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Andrew S. Baker wrote:
> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/09/us/09breach.html
So, basically, someone had an Excel question, and posted a sensitive
spreadsheet to a public site in an effort to solicit assistance.
"You can't fix stupid."
> Apparently from the fut
12 matches
Mail list logo
