:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Getting SQL 2008 to use 16GB RAM
AWE is turned on in this case.
Ed - Still getting the Counters you asked about.
Ken - we are going to try the two-server trick.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Brad DeHart wrote:
Through SQL Server Management
il.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2011 6:25 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Getting SQL 2008 to use 16GB RAM
>
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Ken Schaefer
> wrote:
> > AWE just lets the application use different "chunks" of 4GB address
>
.
Thanks, Brad
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2011 6:25 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Getting SQL 2008 to use 16GB RAM
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Ken Schaefer wrote:
> AWE just lets the application use differe
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Ken Schaefer wrote:
> AWE just lets the application use different “chunks” of 4GB address space.
Something I've been wondering about: Does one have to do anything
special to get MS-SQL 2008 to actually use AWE? Is any tuning
involved?
(I'm not a database guy
32bit app server to connect to the remote x64 SQL Server.
Cheers
Ken
From: G.Waleed Kavalec [mailto:kava...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, 19 March 2011 5:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Getting SQL 2008 to use 16GB RAM
It tells me 2004188
Which makes NO sense.
AWE is on.
/3GB is on.
+, Security +
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
Email:ezi...@lifespan.org
Cell:401-639-3505
From: G.Waleed Kavalec [mailto:kava...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 5:42 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Getting SQL 2008 to use 16GB RAM
It tells me 2004188
Which
ization
>
> Email:ezi...@lifespan.org
>
> Cell:401-639-3505
>
>
>
> *From:* G.Waleed Kavalec [mailto:kava...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2011 4:08 PM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Getting SQL 2008 to use 16GB RAM
>
>
>
> Due to a thi
...@lifespan.org
Cell:401-639-3505
From: G.Waleed Kavalec [mailto:kava...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 4:50 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Getting SQL 2008 to use 16GB RAM
Then I really don't understand why we are paging at all.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 3:48 PM, K
Email:ezi...@lifespan.org
Cell:401-639-3505
From: G.Waleed Kavalec [mailto:kava...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 4:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Getting SQL 2008 to use 16GB RAM
Due to a third party app we have some servers running W2K8 32-bit
SQL 2008 on said machine
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 4:07 PM, G.Waleed Kavalec wrote:
> Due to a third party app we have some servers running W2K8 32-bit
> SQL 2008 on said machines does not seem to want to use the full 16GB
Okay, this gets complicated. Some 'splaining is needed:
On any 32-bit x86 system, each process
: <248-635-4955>248-635-4955
>>
>> From: "G.Waleed Kavalec"
>> Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues
>> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:07:37 -0400
>> To: NT System Admin Issues
>> Subject: Getting SQL 2008 to use 16GB RAM
>>
>> Due to a thir
Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:07:37 -0400
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Getting SQL 2008 to use 16GB RAM
>
> Due to a third party app we have some servers running W2K8 *32-bit*
>
> SQL 2008 on said machines does not seem to want to use the full 16GB
>
> The vendor has N
We are Enterprise.
2008 R2 is only 64bit.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Jeff Bunting wrote:
> Think you need windows enterprise to support more than 4GB. Or R2
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 4:07 PM, G.Waleed Kavalec wrote:
>
>> Due to a third party app we have some servers running W2K8 *32-
software.com>>
Subject: Getting SQL 2008 to use 16GB RAM
Due to a third party app we have some servers running W2K8 32-bit
SQL 2008 on said machines does not seem to want to use the full 16GB
The vendor has NO plans to upgrade their product. (yeah I'm looking at YOU
Sterling Software)
Not if you are 64-bit, though, right?
From: Jeff Bunting [mailto:bunting.j...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 4:25 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Getting SQL 2008 to use 16GB RAM
Think you need windows enterprise to support more than 4GB. Or R2
On Wed, Mar 16
Think you need windows enterprise to support more than 4GB. Or R2
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 4:07 PM, G.Waleed Kavalec wrote:
> Due to a third party app we have some servers running W2K8 *32-bit*
>
> SQL 2008 on said machines does not seem to want to use the full 16GB
>
> The vendor has NO plans t
Due to a third party app we have some servers running W2K8 *32-bit*
SQL 2008 on said machines does not seem to want to use the full 16GB
The vendor has NO plans to upgrade their product. (yeah I'm looking at YOU
Sterling Software)
I have PAE and AWE turned on, and the machine is still using 3GB
17 matches
Mail list logo
