RE: SMB Billing (wasRe: Hyper-V VM's and unnecessary heart failure)

2011-11-02 Thread David Lum
s/changes get approved makes it even sweeter. Sorry veered a little OTfirst time that's happened on this list EVER, LOL. Dave From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 8:37 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: SMB Billing (wasRe: Hyper-

Re: SMB Billing (wasRe: Hyper-V VM's and unnecessary heart failure)

2011-11-02 Thread Jonathan Link
n Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, November 02, 2011 7:56 AM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Hyper-V VM's and unnecessary heart failure > > ** ** > > Totally changing the subject, based on your comment about charging...*

SMB Billing (wasRe: Hyper-V VM's and unnecessary heart failure)

2011-11-02 Thread David Lum
Dave From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 7:56 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Hyper-V VM's and unnecessary heart failure Totally changing the subject, based on your comment about charging... How do you write your bills? On Wed, Nov 2, 2

Re: Hyper-V VM's and unnecessary heart failure

2011-11-02 Thread Jonathan Link
*From:* John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] >> *Sent:* Monday, October 31, 2011 5:56 AM >> >> *To:* NT System Admin Issues >> *Subject:* RE: Hyper-V VM's and unnecessary heart failure >> >> ** ** >> >> I’m not sure I’d ha

Re: Hyper-V VM's and unnecessary heart failure

2011-11-02 Thread Jonathan Link
gt; > Taylor County School District > > www.taylor.k12.fl.us > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] > *Sent:* Saturday, October 29, 2011 2:31 AM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Hyper-V VM'

RE: Hyper-V VM's and unnecessary heart failure

2011-11-02 Thread David Lum
11 5:56 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Hyper-V VM's and unnecessary heart failure I'm not sure I'd have felt guilty for charging them for the full hour. This seems like a rather obscure issue-not the type of thing you'd have been expected to know (if the latter, the

Re: Hyper-V VM's and unnecessary heart failure

2011-10-31 Thread Steven Peck
; > ** ** > > *From:* David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] > *Sent:* Saturday, October 29, 2011 2:31 AM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Hyper-V VM's and unnecessary heart failure > > ** ** > > Remotely working on a %nightjob% client tonight, both a VM

RE: Hyper-V VM's and unnecessary heart failure

2011-10-31 Thread John Hornbuckle
29, 2011 2:31 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Hyper-V VM's and unnecessary heart failure Remotely working on a %nightjob% client tonight, both a VM and corresponding host unexpectedly drop my LogMeIn connection. I see from LogMeIn that other systems in that room are online, so I kno

RE: Hyper-V VM's and unnecessary heart failure

2011-10-30 Thread Benjamin Zachary
Subject: RE: Hyper-V VM's and unnecessary heart failure SO does vmware. If you try to move a host from one server to another, either a mounted CD/DVD or a mounted floppy will cause it to fail. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchang

RE: Hyper-V VM's and unnecessary heart failure

2011-10-30 Thread Michael B. Smith
30, 2011 6:35 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Hyper-V VM's and unnecessary heart failure XenServer will also freak out if anything is mounted on the CD/DVD drive and you attempt to do a host update. You have to manually eject any media from the drive for all VMs before you can u

RE: Hyper-V VM's and unnecessary heart failure

2011-10-30 Thread Webster
<http://www.carlwebster.com/> From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com] Subject: Re: Hyper-V VM's and unnecessary heart failure Funny Dave...I've seen that issue with HyperV too... Sent from my FriPad On 2011-10-29, at 11:10 PM, Rene de Haas mailto:rene.deh...@gmail.com>&g

Re: Hyper-V VM's and unnecessary heart failure

2011-10-29 Thread Steve Ens
Funny Dave...I've seen that issue with HyperV too... Sent from my FriPad On 2011-10-29, at 11:10 PM, Rene de Haas wrote: > +1000 > Op 30 okt. 2011 01:16 schreef "Andrew S. Baker" het > volgende: > I'm always amazed by how the most (otherwise) elegant and robust solutions > can fail because o

Re: Hyper-V VM's and unnecessary heart failure

2011-10-29 Thread Rene de Haas
+1000 Op 30 okt. 2011 01:16 schreef "Andrew S. Baker" het volgende: > I'm always amazed by how the most (otherwise) elegant and robust solutions > can fail because of some silly configuration that should handled in a very > different way. > > * * > > *ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harness

Re: Hyper-V VM's and unnecessary heart failure

2011-10-29 Thread Andrew S. Baker
I'm always amazed by how the most (otherwise) elegant and robust solutions can fail because of some silly configuration that should handled in a very different way. * * *ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market… * On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at

RE: Hyper-V VM's and unnecessary heart failure

2011-10-29 Thread Bob Fronk
, October 29, 2011 2:31 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Hyper-V VM's and unnecessary heart failure Remotely working on a %nightjob% client tonight, both a VM and corresponding host unexpectedly drop my LogMeIn connection. I see from LogMeIn that other systems in that room are online,