Sounds good thanks, except the 30% overhead for debugging, what's up with
that!! :)
Greg
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 3 March 2008 2:03 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1
The 2.0 beta has some
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Greg Mulholland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds good thanks, except the 30% overhead for debugging, what's up with
that!! :)
I suspect that's because it's a beta version.
-- Ben
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~
Yeah, I found out the hard way, thus the hardway of making the vmdk think
it's a 1.0 version was a lot of fun.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Mulholland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 3:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1
I think Azaleos has an Exchange 2007 VMWare appliance in the works
http://www.azaleos.com/blog/#id3
Even with Microsoft support concerns, VMWare does promote the
virtualization of Exchange on VMWare. I would too if I were them...
they have this great window of opportunity handed to them by
-Original Message-
From: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: MS Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Melahn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: MS Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1
Argh! How did I miss that? So there's no way to VM
Have you seen this?
VMware VDI on NetApp, 100 clients; 13 mins; 10 GB used
http://youtube.com/watch?v=7Miv0PiJFzM
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Zachary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008 9:12 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Virtual Server 2005 R2
2005 R2 SP1
-Original Message-
From: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: MS Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Melahn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: MS Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1
Argh! How did I miss that? So there's no way
-Original Message-
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: MS Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1
You can't have both Workstation and Server installed on the same
machine? Or running at the same time?
When I try to install Server it tells me that Workstation is installed
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 3 March 2008 11:20 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1
-Original Message-
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: MS Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1
You can't have both Workstation and Server installed on the same
I think Ben Z has been playing with the 2.0 beta version for awhile now.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Mulholland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2008 8:32 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1
Exactly what Ken said! You can only use
The 2.0 beta has some nice features already shown on its feature list. One
thing that people are complaining about though is that it went to a web only
interface like Virtual Center. The nice part about it is the people who
use/know vc this is an easy manageable interface. The people who don't
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Melahn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: MS Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1
Argh! How did I miss that? So there's no way to VM Exchange 2007 in my
lab. What are people doing to test Exch 2007?
I'll be doing that this weekend using VMware Workstation
I have seen the truth, and it makes no sense.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Melahn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: February-29-08 2:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1
Argh! How did I miss that? So there's no way to VM Exchange 2007 in my
There's a 32-bit, non-Production version available for download.
On 2/29/08 1:33 PM, Dennis Melahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Argh! How did I miss that? So there's no way to VM Exchange 2007 in my lab.
What are people doing to test Exch 2007?
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus
However remember if you go that direction that Exchange 2007 is unsupported on
the beta of Server 2008.
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 3:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 4:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1
Argh! How did I miss that? So there's no way to VM Exchange 2007 in my lab.
What are people doing to test Exch 2007?
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam
Quick question to see if anyone is still working on a Friday afternoon. I have
installed this on a Server 2003 R2 SP1 x64 host. Can I install 64 bit guests?
I ask because I am getting a error message when I try to install S2K3R2SP1x64
on a VM. It says the CPU is only capable of 32 bit
29, 2008 4:19 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: MS Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1
Quick question to see if anyone is still working on a Friday afternoon. I have
installed this on a Server 2003 R2 SP1 x64 host. Can I install 64 bit guests?
I ask because I am getting a error message when I try
Argh! How did I miss that? So there's no way to VM Exchange 2007 in my lab.
What are people doing to test Exch 2007?
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Melahn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 1:19 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: MS Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1
Quick question to see if anyone is still working on a Friday afternoon. I have
installed this on a Server 2003 R2 SP1 x64 host. Can I install 64 bit guests
20 matches
Mail list logo
