Re: PIX mungles SMTP headers

Not surprising since the 5321 update is less than a month old. Steven Peck wrote: > This was a few years ago and evidently I missed the 5321 update though. -- Phil Brutsche [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

Re: PIX mungles SMTP headers

This was a few years ago and evidently I missed the 5321 update though. On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Phil Brutsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > RFC 2821 is obsolete BTW > > RFC 5321 is the successor > > http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5321.txt > > Steven Peck wrote: >> The Cisco PIX is proudl

Re: PIX mungles SMTP headers

RFC 2821 is obsolete BTW RFC 5321 is the successor http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5321.txt Steven Peck wrote: > The Cisco PIX is proudly compliant with RFC821. When I pointed out to > our network team that the rest of the world was on RFC2821 then Cisco > support said, oh, then you might want

Re: PIX mungles SMTP headers

:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 2:44 PM >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: RE: PIX mungles SMTP headers >> >> OTOH, from what I've read/heard, it was more MS' Exchange settings, or >> at least in the way Exchange handles

RE: PIX mungles SMTP headers

er 231-845-2319 -Original Message- From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 2:40 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: PIX mungles SMTP headers Yessir it is, same bad default settings. Chinnery, Paul wrote: > Is that in the ASA lineup, too? Cisco

RE: PIX mungles SMTP headers

- > From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 2:44 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: PIX mungles SMTP headers > > OTOH, from what I've read/heard, it was more MS' Exchange settings, or > at least in the way Exchange

Re: PIX mungles SMTP headers

Yessir it is, same bad default settings. Chinnery, Paul wrote: > Is that in the ASA lineup, too? Cisco prolly figures why change it > since they EOL'ed the Pix line. Thankfully, I've still got a few > years before I have to budget a replacement. -- Phil Brutsche [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ Finally,

RE: PIX mungles SMTP headers

From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 2:22 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: PIX mungles SMTP headers Try "no fixup protocol smtp" That particular feature was useful when the PIX line was created in the mid '90s. These days it'

Re: PIX mungles SMTP headers

Try "no fixup protocol smtp" That particular feature was useful when the PIX line was created in the mid '90s. These days it's more of a hinderance. Cisco leaving it on by default is a major screwup on their part. Klint Price - ArizonaITPro wrote: > Does anyone know what setting I need to correc

RE: PIX mungles SMTP headers

ber 15, 2008 2:16 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: PIX mungles SMTP headers Does anyone know what setting I need to correct on a PIX 501 so it does not mungle the SMTP banner? **00*2** ***200**2*2*

PIX mungles SMTP headers

Does anyone know what setting I need to correct on a PIX 501 so it does not mungle the SMTP banner? **00*2*200**2*2***0*00 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <