Thanks you all for your interesting responses and advice. Much appreciated.
Thanks
Pierre
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
Hi all
We are planning to deploy Sharepoint 2010 on a virtual machine running
under VMware ESXi 4.1 and we were going to allocate the following resouces
to it:
16 GB RAM
2 vCPUs
This Sharepoint 2010 installation will be running under Windows Server
2008 R2 and will be catering for circa
Sent: Wed Sep 14 06:01:49 2011
Subject: Query re Virtual CPUs
Hi all
We are planning to deploy Sharepoint 2010 on a virtual machine running under
VMware ESXi 4.1 and we were going to allocate the following resouces to it:
16 GB RAM
2 vCPUs
This Sharepoint 2010 installation will be running
*Sent*: Wed Sep 14 06:01:49 2011
*Subject*: Query re Virtual CPUs
Hi all
We are planning to deploy Sharepoint 2010 on a virtual machine running
under VMware ESXi 4.1 and we were going to allocate the following resouces
to it:
16 GB RAM
2 vCPUs
This Sharepoint 2010 installation
Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
*Sent*: Wed Sep 14 06:01:49 2011
*Subject*: Query re Virtual CPUs
Hi all
We are planning to deploy Sharepoint 2010 on a virtual machine running
under VMware ESXi 4.1 and we were going to allocate the following resouces
to it:
16 GB RAM
2
ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Sent: Wed Sep 14 08:13:25 2011
Subject: Re: Query re Virtual CPUs
On this rare circumstance, I am going to disagree with ASB. While tech editing
a book, I ran this exact scenario. With the SQL and SharePoint on the same
virtual guest allocated 16G, I
...@fosterclark.com
*To*: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
*Sent*: Wed Sep 14 06:01:49 2011
*Subject*: Query re Virtual CPUs
Hi all
We are planning to deploy Sharepoint 2010 on a virtual machine running
under VMware ESXi 4.1 and we were going to allocate the following
--
*From*: pierre.camill...@fosterclark.com
pierre.camill...@fosterclark.com
*To*: NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
*Sent*: Wed Sep 14 06:01:49 2011
*Subject*: Query re Virtual CPUs
Hi all
We are planning to deploy Sharepoint 2010 on a virtual machine running
the technet doc.
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 4:19 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Query re Virtual CPUs
Agreed.
With ~25 active users, and even a shared SQL instance, that server would be
fine with 4-6GB RAM
ASB
http://XeeMe.com
I setup a WSS3 (previous version) single server farm using the included MSDE
database. I had no budget and used VMware Server on a Windows 2003 build,
8GB RAM, and 5 146G drives in a Raid5 setup. I had a couple of low use (WSUS
and DPM) VMs on the host also. The WSS VM only had 1G of RAM, single
to be. If you have
1GB of content, then 16GB of RAM is more than enough.
Cheers
Ken
From: Kevin Lundy [mailto:klu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 14 September 2011 8:49 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Query re Virtual CPUs
IMO putting the SQL on the same server is what pushes the memory up.
Yep
11 matches
Mail list logo