Re: R: R: New DHCP scope

] > Inviato: sabato 24 ottobre 2009 16.56 > A: NT System Admin Issues > Oggetto: Re: R: New DHCP scope > > While I don't know all of your circumstances, it seems to me that instead of > trying to do funky things with DHCP, you'd be better off re-architecting your >

R: R: New DHCP scope

scope. AFAIK reserved clients options supersede common options. Isn't right ? GuidoElia HELPPC -Messaggio originale- Da: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Inviato: sabato 24 ottobre 2009 16.56 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: R: New DHCP scope While I don't know a

Re: R: New DHCP scope

While I don't know all of your circumstances, it seems to me that instead of trying to do funky things with DHCP, you'd be better off re-architecting your network. Having two different exits from your network segment seems a bit inefficient or confusing. I understand that this might not be under y

Re: R: New DHCP scope

In this instance you should set reservation or class options, see http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc958929.aspx Have a look at that and if you need any more help then come back to us. But I would urge you to go this route rather

R: New DHCP scope

In a corporate network I have to add some Cisco IP phones that must be in the same segment but use a different default gateway (the corporate router and not the local DSL router) and add a DHCP option or TFT serverf GuidoElia HELPPC _ Da: Ben Schorr [mailto:b...@rolandschorr.com] Inv

R: New DHCP scope

I need some addresses for Cisco phones , but the default gateway should be a corporate router and not the local DSL router GuidoElia HELPPC _ Da: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com] Inviato: sabato 24 ottobre 2009 6.49 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: RE: New DHCP scope