Not yet, but I'll say that if all the cobol programs made it thru Y2K
without major issue only to have all the PC stuff crash a decade later,
I'd have to chuckle.
-sc
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 9:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:
Yep. Just got this about Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager.
Symantec Endpoint Protection Management Server considers any
definition updates dated after December 31, 2009 to be out-of-date.
Any definitions dated in 2010 are being thrown away without being sent
to client computers.
Indeed. :)
Especially since organizations are quite a bit thinner in the IT staffing
area this year than a decade ago.
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Providing Competitive Advantage through Effective IT Leadership*
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Steven M. Caesare
My guess would expand a bit on Andrew's to say how much of the code from
Cobol has been ported over to PC's and is still in use? From reading the
article it would appear that some of it has made it through with out the
needed re-writes.
Jon
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Andrew S. Baker
: RE: 2010 date problems anyone?
Yep. Just got this about Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager.
Symantec Endpoint Protection Management Server considers any definition
updates dated after December 31, 2009 to be out-of-date.
Any definitions dated in 2010 are being thrown away without being
*
--
*Da:* Glen Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
*Inviato:* martedì 5 gennaio 2010 16.04
*A:* NT System Admin Issues
*Oggetto:* RE: 2010 date problems anyone?
Yep. Just got this about Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager.
Symantec Endpoint Protection Management
Oh... It's another link to the story concerning Symantec's products. My
first reaction was that I'd not been out of the house except to work this
year. Then again, there's only been one weekend...
HEY, we've had OT threads here before!
David Lum david@nwea.org wrote on 01/05/2010
WOW. Symantec FTL, again...
--
ME2
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Glen Johnson gjohn...@vhcc.edu wrote:
Yep. Just got this about Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager.
Symantec Endpoint Protection Management Server considers any definition
updates dated after December 31, 2009 to be
for you.
C and C++, on the other hand, don’t care. You can cast anything to just
about anything and the compiler will let you.
*From:* Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 05, 2010 11:17 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: 2010 date problems anyone
That's because we don't code in COBOL.
Alex
Running and ducking at the same time
From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 11:21 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: 2010 date problems anyone?
Vipre had no issues with the date change
of
lines of COBOL in use, the world over. It’s not going anywhere anytime soon.
It’s just not “cool” anymore.
*From:* Alex Eckelberry [mailto:al...@sunbelt-software.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 05, 2010 1:57 PM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* RE: 2010 date problems anyone?
That’s
Johnson [mailto:gjohn...@vhcc.edu]
Inviato: martedì 5 gennaio 2010 17.18
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: 2010 date problems anyone?
After reading lots of posts, they say that the problem is only in the SEPM
code. Standalone clients aren't affected. Standalone clients will still get
the 12/31
[mailto:al...@sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 1:57 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 2010 date problems anyone?
That’s because we don’t code in COBOL.
Alex
Running and ducking at the same time
From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com]
Sent
problems anyone?
That’s because we don’t code in COBOL.
Alex
Running and ducking at the same time
From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 11:21 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: 2010 date problems anyone
of
lines of COBOL in use, the world over. It’s not going anywhere anytime
soon.
It’s just not “cool” anymore.
From: Alex Eckelberry [mailto:al...@sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 1:57 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 2010 date problems anyone
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 2010 date problems anyone?
That’s because we don’t code in COBOL.
Alex
Running and ducking at the same time
From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 11:21 AM
.
From: Alex Eckelberry [mailto:al...@sunbelt-software.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 1:57 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 2010 date problems anyone?
That’s because we don’t code in COBOL.
Alex
Running and ducking at the same time
17 matches
Mail list logo
