Try remove full mailbox access rights from SELF.
AD users and computers - view - advanced features.
Open properties page of user. Exchange Advanced - mailbox rights.
Andrew.
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 12:29 PM
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Ilichov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 September 2001 08:52
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Question
Try remove full mailbox access rights from SELF.
AD users and computers - view - advanced features.
Open properties
From:
Lefkovics, William
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 10:47
PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
Even I-mail, a plain vanilla (boring) email server
isn't farbehind in price!If a client just wants a basic POP/SMTP
server,
:
ista.comSubject: RE: Exchange 2000
Hey wait neither is he ;)
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 1:19 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
Ok, now you're just toying with me. I'm not the one with over 100
Exchange2000 deployments
through M$'s
site and look for new OL holes!
Jlc
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 3:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
I've been on systems with Exchange, Groupwise and Notes. Currently
-
From: Joe L. Casale
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: 9/9/01 12:55 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
I think 1300.00 bucks Canadian last I checked for E2k?
Expensive?
Considering what you can do w/ it, I think not!
Geesh! Even I-mail, a plain vanilla (boring) email server isn't far
behind in price
Lefkovics, William
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 10:47
PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
Even I-mail, a plain vanilla (boring) email server
isn't farbehind in price!If a client just wants a basic POP/SMTP
server, the price for the productwould be almost nothin
999 736 0309 ext 4537
C: +5 999 563 1845
F: +5 999 733 1259
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 4:27 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
sigh I guess I'll have to weigh
Before you implement anything Exchange, I think it is in your best
interest, (as in that of your company, users, and IT staff) to look into
alternative E-mail platforms. My first suggestion would be Lotus Domino.
Their server software is more stable, easier to administer, and MORE SECURE
than
My opinions to your questions.
1. For now that should get you by. The best thing to do is set it all up and
do some performance monitoring on it for a week or two. Get your average
load and go from there.
2. Don't really understand what your saying here. However you don't have to
use Outlook to
1) That hardware is only adequate. Definitely a RAID for the Information
Stores would be beneficial. At least separate controllers for the logs and
databases. Hard drive space can not be assessed without policy, need, and
behavior patterns of users in your company. Some people leverage all
that your job DEPENDS on it.
Lefkovics, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 09/07/2001 12:14:46 PM
Please respond to NT System Admin Issues
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: NT System Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
How can you suggest that those hardware specs would be good
Title: RE: Exchange 2000
First positive comments I have ever heard about Lotus.
Had a buddy who tried to implement it at his old site and was fired for the ONLY reason that they hated the client interface.
Personally I find Williams comments insightful and always helpful and calling him
]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 12:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Exchange 2000
Billyboy-
I did a little research on Holaday before I posted my comments. They
have 100 employees in the heart of Minnesota, they manufacture printed
circuit boards, and their web page
them.
Thanks. BTW you owe William an apology, a very well written formal,
publicly posted one.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 12:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
Billyboy-
I did
Forgot this.
If possible don't put E2k on a DC. If you must it's ok but not a best
practice.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Mediger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 6:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000
We are looking at implementing
System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
Don't really care how your ego was affected by Mr. Lefkovics [1] your
comments were totally unwarranted and unwanted. Of the normal posters to
this list Williams is one pay check that does not depend as much on
Microsoft products. He has researched
Lexitron, Inc
(201) 892-6399
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 12:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Exchange 2000
I never said he wasn't a constant source of outstanding information.
William attacked
As you wish, oh great wise Mr. Lefkovics.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 1:14 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
Water under the bridge.
Let's move on.
Thanks for the kind words, Kevin
Ok, now you're just toying with me. I'm not the one with over 100
Exchange2000 deployments under my belt!
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 10:20 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
As you wish, oh
Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 10:14 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
Water under the bridge.
Let's move on.
Thanks for the kind words, Kevin.
Yes, I've spent about 40 hours on the MS-less office report
Well said Kevin !
All I can say is *.csc.com = /dev/null
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 12:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
W dude.. Settle down there cowboy. You just bad mouthed
...
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 10:08 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
W dude.. Settle down there cowboy. You just bad mouthed one of the
best guys we have on this list.
As far as myself being
I had the reformat command all loaded on his server waiting for someone
to press enter for me. Just could not do it.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 4:18 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
You know
07, 2001 2:03 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
I had the reformat command all loaded on his server waiting for someone
to press enter for me. Just could not do it.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 4:18 PM
, September 07, 2001 2:03 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
I had the reformat command all loaded on his server waiting for someone
to press enter for me. Just could not do it.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 4:18
27 matches
Mail list logo
