I think you've got that figured.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 6:40 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Group membership updates
I know that there's
Is the issue around Kerberos tickets? Is it that YOU want to update
Their memberships or you want Them to be able to do it to themselves?
You could have them purge their tickets with klist if they are somewhat
savvy...
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20,
We tend to deploy applications to users via group membership. The shortcuts
to applications are held in a single shared desktop folder, with NTFS
permissions on each shortcut linking to the application group. It is quick
and dirty and saves writing new entries to the relevant GPOs every time you
Issues
Subject: Re: Group membership updates
We tend to deploy applications to users via group membership. The
shortcuts to applications are held in a single shared desktop folder,
with NTFS permissions on each shortcut linking to the application group.
It is quick and dirty and saves writing new
[mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, April 20, 2010 8:47 AM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Re: Group membership updates
We tend to deploy applications to users via group membership. The shortcuts
to applications are held in a single shared desktop folder, with NTFS
PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Group membership updates
If you purge the TGT and then try to access a network resource by FQDN then a
new TGT with upgraded memberships should be issued.
You can test with klist tgt to see in action.
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com
as likely
to complain that they have to go through the workaround steps, too.
-Malcolm
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 08:47
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Group membership updates
We tend to deploy applications to users via group
Which is why I originally replied as I did. :)
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Malcolm Reitz [mailto:malcolm.re...@live.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 12:52 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Group membership updates
It should - the short name is a valid SPN component by default
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
c - 312.731.3132
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 11:37 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Group membership updates
Does