Re: Licensing question

2011-03-15 Thread Andrew S. Baker
- http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/us/licensing-rds.aspx - http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/about-licensing/product-licensing-overview.aspx - http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/about-licensing/volume-licensing-briefs.aspx#tab=2

RE: Licensing question

2011-03-15 Thread Guyer, Don
7282 x 1673 Fax: 610-293-4499 www.fiserv.com <http://www.fiserv.com/> From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 9:46 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Licensing question Can restrict on anything - user, group, OU, IP address, client nam

Re: Licensing question

2011-03-15 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 9:46 AM, James Rankin wrote: > I was > wondering if anyone had come across the same issues and gotten a definitive > answer, but it looks like I'll have to get onto MS. In my experience, if you keep asking MS licensing the same question, eventually you'll get an answer y

Re: Licensing question

2011-03-15 Thread James Rankin
gt; > Datasafe Platform > > Enterprise Technology Group > > *Fiserv* > > don.gu...@fiserv.com > > Office: 1-800-523-7282 x 1673 > > Fax: 610-293-4499 > > www.fiserv.com > > > > *From:* Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org] > *Sent:* Tuesday, Mar

Re: Licensing question

2011-03-15 Thread Kramer, Jack
:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:04:29 -0400 To: NT System Admin Issues mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>> Subject: Re: Licensing question Hmmm. I don't know whether AppSense are trying to pull the wool over my eyes then. They sent me this docum

RE: Licensing question

2011-03-15 Thread Guyer, Don
m: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 9:37 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Licensing question Talk to Microsoft. At least you'll get an MS answer. >>> James Rankin 3/15/2011 9:04 AM >>> Hmmm. I don't know whether AppSens

Re: Licensing question

2011-03-15 Thread Tom Miller
Talk to Microsoft. At least you'll get an MS answer. >>> James Rankin 3/15/2011 9:04 AM >>> Hmmm. I don't know whether AppSense are trying to pull the wool over my eyes then. They sent me this document http://www.appsense.com/Files/Documents/Microsoft%20Application%20License%20Control%20%28U

Re: Licensing question

2011-03-15 Thread James Rankin
Hmmm. I don't know whether AppSense are trying to pull the wool over my eyes then. They sent me this document http://www.appsense.com/Files/Documents/Microsoft%20Application%20License%20Control%20%28US%29.pdf which seems to indicate that "*how the network is set up and how access is provided to M

Re: Licensing question

2011-03-15 Thread Tom Miller
We purchase enough licenses so that each person who will potentially access the MS application has a license. So we purchase fewer licenses of MS Visio/Project/Access than the general MS Office Standard Suite. Access to those applications is limited to a number of staff in a special group, whi

Re: Licensing question on educational discounts

2010-10-20 Thread James Kerr
No, you have medics on staff so you will be denied unless you are an FQHC and operating as an FQHC exclusively which you are not because you are teaching also. Our clinics are FQHCs but we are denied because we provide other services which makes us not operating exclusively as an FQHC. It sucks.

RE: Licensing question on educational discounts

2010-10-20 Thread Eldridge, Dave
Good question I will find out. From: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:eric.wittersh...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 2:29 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Licensing question on educational discounts Are you accredited by the ACGME yet? On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:24 PM

Re: Licensing question on educational discounts

2010-10-20 Thread Eric Wittersheim
Are you accredited by the ACGME yet? On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Eldridge, Dave wrote: > Just testing the list for opinions. > > We currently are a non-profit hospital. We are starting a teaching > residency program for internal medicine Doctors and hope to have our first > students here i

RE: Licensing question

2009-06-25 Thread Ziots, Edward
When I read SQL licensing, the web-server is the multi-plexing device, so even-though you have 1 SQL account or connection into the DB backend whether it sits on the main webserver or a separate machine, it still needs to be licensed for the number of possible users of the webserver if this is pub

RE: Licensing question

2009-06-24 Thread Michael B. Smith
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 10:44 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Licensing question I believe that is in reference to previous versions of Web Edition only allowing you to install 3rd party apps that did the same function as MS supplied apps (IE, you could run a different FTP server on

RE: Licensing question

2009-06-24 Thread Joe Heaton
2009 10:44 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Licensing question I believe that is in reference to previous versions of Web Edition only allowing you to install 3rd party apps that did the same function as MS supplied apps (IE, you could run a different FTP server on Web Edition since IIS

RE: Licensing question

2009-06-24 Thread Andy Ognenoff
I believe that is in reference to previous versions of Web Edition only allowing you to install 3rd party apps that did the same function as MS supplied apps (IE, you could run a different FTP server on Web Edition since IIS had an FTP server built in.) Previously, I don’t think you could install d

RE: Licensing question

2009-06-10 Thread John Aldrich
Yes, I believe we have *user* CALs, not per server CALs. -Original Message- From: Andy Ognenoff [mailto:andyognen...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 12:31 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Licensing question Note that the text you included from the page was listed

RE: Licensing question

2009-06-10 Thread John Aldrich
Admin Issues Subject: RE: Licensing question You vendor would be wrong per the link Cameron sent. On the page for Windows Server: Ø The Windows CALs you acquire are designated for use exclusively with a particular server. What would be good is applications such as AV to internally

RE: Licensing question

2009-06-10 Thread Andy Ognenoff
: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 11:21 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Licensing question You vendor would be wrong per the link Cameron sent. On the page for Windows Server: ➢ The Windows CALs you acquire are designated for use exclusively with a particular server. What would be good is

RE: Licensing question

2009-06-10 Thread Mike Gill
] Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 5:52 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Licensing question My understanding is that you have to have enough Windows Server CALs for everyone on your network, and that CALs “float” between servers. At least that’s what our vendor told us when we went to

RE: Licensing question

2009-06-10 Thread Cameron Cooper
--Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 9:55 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Licensing question On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Cameron Cooper wrote: > Also believe that you can either set them up per user or per seat ... As

Re: Licensing question

2009-06-10 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Cameron Cooper wrote: > Also believe that you can either set them up per user or per seat ... As I understand it: Each given CAL can be assigned to a user or a device. You can mix types within an organization. For example, here, we assign CALs to people with

RE: Licensing question

2009-06-10 Thread Joe Heaton
Ok, that makes sense. Thanks guys for the help. Joe Heaton Employment Training Panel From: Carl Houseman [mailto:c.house...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 8:24 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Licensing question Generally people buy Windows CALs for workstations

RE: Licensing question

2009-06-10 Thread John Aldrich
I believe you're correct. However, since we don't have Exchange or TS, we're good. J John-AldrichTile-Tools From: Cameron Cooper [mailto:ccoo...@aurico.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 8:57 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Licensing question >From wha

RE: Licensing question

2009-06-10 Thread Cameron Cooper
o:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 7:52 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Licensing question My understanding is that you have to have enough Windows Server CALs for everyone on your network, and that CALs "float" between servers. At least that&#

RE: Licensing question

2009-06-10 Thread John Aldrich
My understanding is that you have to have enough Windows Server CALs for everyone on your network, and that CALs "float" between servers. At least that's what our vendor told us when we went to Active Directory last year. John-AldrichTile-Tools From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]

RE: Licensing question

2009-06-09 Thread Ken Schaefer
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/us/client-licensing.aspx You can license: per server: each server needs 1 CAL for each concurrent connection. or per user: each user needs a CAL. Allows access to as many Windows servers as you have or per device: each device needs a CAL. Allows acces

RE: Licensing question

2009-06-09 Thread Carl Houseman
Generally people buy Windows CALs for workstations, not servers. A W2K3 CAL assigned to a workstation allows access to all W2K3 servers owned by the company that bought the CAL. Carl From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 5:51 PM To: NT System Admin Issu

Re: Licensing question

2009-06-09 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Joe Heaton wrote: > Does every server have to have CALs for everyone in your organization? Well, technically speaking, servers don't need CALs at all, clients do. :) Every "client" that is "accessing" a server needs a CAL. In this context, "client" can be d

RE: Licensing question

2008-09-11 Thread David Mazzaccaro
Actually, you can get TS CALs in retail format... TJA-00124 (5 user retail box TS User CALS) -Original Message- From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 9:47 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Licensing question IME yes. Keep in mind that

Re: Licensing question

2008-09-11 Thread Phil Brutsche
IME yes. Keep in mind that Win2k only supports *devices* licenses. That bit me in the arse when we eventually decided to upgrade to a 2003 TS. Also keep in mind that: a) TS CALs are only available through volume licensing b) You may not be able to get 2003 CALs, thus you may need to get 2008 CAL

RE: Licensing question for a SBS box transitioned to win2k3

2008-04-28 Thread Joe Heaton
ELPPC Da: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Inviato: lunedì 28 aprile 2008 12.16 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: RE: Licensing question for a SBS box transitioned to win2k3 NO you are not obligated, morally, ethically or legally, to enable that se

RE: Licensing question for a SBS box transitioned to win2k3

2008-04-28 Thread Webster
NO you are not obligated, morally, ethically or legally, to enable that service. Webster From: HELP_PC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Licensing question for a SBS box transitioned to win2k3 I transitioned a SBS2k3 SBS box to win2k3 and I have bought the licences packs (no product k