RE: New ISP - I have to route public IP's

2011-11-15 Thread John Gwinner
| From: Kurt Buff | Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 9:55 PM Thanks Kurt | Not odd at all. Pretty standard. Well, we've gone through 4 ISP's over the last 11 years, and they always give me a /248 IP. Granted, they route upstream very similar, but I never have to supply the router beyond the r

RE: New ISP - I have to route public IP's

2011-11-15 Thread John Gwinner
John == John Gwinner | Director of Technology DAZSI /Oracle Business Applications 310.640.1300 (office) | 310.640.9900 (fax) 880 Apollo Street - Ste. 201 | El Segundo CA 90245 [cid:image002.jpg@01CCA328.768133E0]<http://www.dazsi.com/> From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.c

Re: New ISP - I have to route public IP's

2011-11-14 Thread Kurt Buff
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 20:19, John Gwinner wrote: > I just signed up with a new ISP for the office – we’re getting 15Meg for the > price I used to pay for 2 T-1’s.  Nice! Nice. > Oddly though, I get a single IP in the range 216.2.69.x/30 and a default > gateway. This isn’t a T-1 or other teleco

RE: New ISP - I have to route public IP's

2011-11-14 Thread Brian Desmond
I don't see how an L3 switch is required here. Certainly you could solve this problem with one but it's not necessary. You can do all the routing with TMG if you want. Why do you need separate IPs for the web servers given they're all being proxied through TMG, btw? Thanks, Brian Desmond br..