tober 2009 6:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: New partition
Good point.
Keeping the old re-lettered E: partition around, though perhaps
smaller to allow for a larger C: partition, is a pretty good idea.
Kurt
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 10:12, John Cook wrote:
> I wouldn't put t
Buff
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Sent: Sat Oct 17 13:02:07 2009
> Subject: Re: New partition
>
> What data lives on the E: drive currently? The answer to that is kinda
> crucial to my proposal.
>
> I would, myself, do the following, which is close to what you are
&g
n the Cloud
- Original Message -
From: Kurt Buff
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Sat Oct 17 13:02:07 2009
Subject: Re: New partition
What data lives on the E: drive currently? The answer to that is kinda
crucial to my proposal.
I would, myself, do the following, which is close to what yo
What data lives on the E: drive currently? The answer to that is kinda
crucial to my proposal.
I would, myself, do the following, which is close to what you are
considering, but a bit simpler - you might not even have to reboot
with this procedure after installing the new disks and letting the
RAI
Hi Gavin,
Can I ask you whether you need to extend the C: partition to occupy the
whole space? Is the 20GB currently allocated not enough?
Also, if the mirrors are hardware-based, do you know for a fact that you can
extend arrays like that in a non-destructive way, i.e., that won't destroy
your op
