Sounds like it wont cause a problem.
Ok time to have a look and test in the lab
Thanks for your help
Graeme
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 5:16 AM, HELP_PC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And in any case you lose ability to see last access to the file from
> properties
>
>
> GuidoElia
> HELPPC
>
> -
Wednesday, September 24, 2008 11:22 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: R: NTFSDisableLastAccessUpdate regkey
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 7:07 AM, Michael B. Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use this key extensively for file server performance improvement.
>
> While I'm not g
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 7:07 AM, Michael B. Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use this key extensively for file server performance improvement.
>
> While I'm not going to tell you that it WON'T affect your applications, I
> will tell you that I've never had a problem with using it.
+1 for my ex
cc
09/24/2008 08:29
AMSubject
RE: R: NTFSDisableLastAccessUpdate
regkey
: Glen Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 5:05 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: R: NTFSDisableLastAccessUpdate regkey
I've never tried it on a server but I can say for sure that it made a big
difference on a XP box with loads of mp3s.
XP box is a
"Graeme Carstairs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/24/2008 04:51:12 AM:
> Thats what I though
>
> The MS KB/Technet info says to make the setting on Windows 2000 if
> you have over 70,000 folders in an NTFS volume.
>
> But this guy insists its made his home server, and PC much faster
> and wan
o: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: R: NTFSDisableLastAccessUpdate regkey
This is where a test/development server comes in...I've never had cause to
enable something like this myself, but rather than find out the hard way that
some piece of software relies on it, this would be an ide
ystem Admin Issues
Subject: Re: R: NTFSDisableLastAccessUpdate regkey
This is where a test/development server comes in...I've never had cause to
enable something like this myself, but rather than find out the hard way that
some piece of software relies on it, this would be an ideal time to
increase and on what type of workload.
Hope this helps...
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 7:07 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: R: NTFSDisableLastAccessUpdate regkey
I use this key extensively for file server performance improvement
://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael
Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange
From: Graeme Carstairs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 4:51 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: R: NTFSDisableLastAccessUpdate regkey
Thats what I though
This is where a test/development server comes in...I've never had cause to
enable something like this myself, but rather than find out the hard way
that some piece of software relies on it, this would be an ideal time to
break out a free copy of VMWare Server and VMWare converter and see exactly
wh
Thats what I though
The MS KB/Technet info says to make the setting on Windows 2000 if you have
over 70,000 folders in an NTFS volume.
But this guy insists its made his home server, and PC much faster and wants
to do it to his work one.
I am wary, working on the asumption if it made such a huge d
12 matches
Mail list logo
