...@blueridgecarpet.com
To:
NT System Admin Issues ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Date:
13/04/2010 16:15
Subject:
RE: Remote, on-the-road users
I don't. Period. The remote users are responsible for their own equipment.
The company does not supply laptops, cell phones, etc to our remote users
Ken you are right, DirectAccess was developed with this scenario in mind.
Andrew
On 14 April 2010 00:12, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote:
Can't SCCM 2007 manage clients over HTTPS?
I assume that DirectAccess is designed to help solve some of these
problems, by basically setting up
There's always something like Viewfinity too.
WWW.viewfinity.com
Andrew Levicki and...@levicki.me.uk wrote:
Ken you are right, DirectAccess was developed with this scenario in mind.
Andrew
On 14 April 2010 00:12, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote:
Can't SCCM 2007 manage clients over
How about cisco nac
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: John Hornbuckle john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:17:41
To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Remote, on-the-road users
I'm sure there are much
Direct access ???
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Levicki and...@levicki.me.uk
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:52:26
To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: Re: Remote, on-the-road users
Ken you are right, DirectAccess
@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: Remote, on-the-road users
We have scientists, and game wardens, who don't come into offices. They go
straight out into the field, which in our case, is really in the fields...
John Hornbuckle john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us 4/13/2010 8:17 AM
I'm sure
Can't SCCM 2007 manage clients over HTTPS?
I assume that DirectAccess is designed to help solve some of these problems, by
basically setting up a VPN without the users need to do it manually.
Cheers
Ken
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov]
Sent: Tuesday,
I don't. Period. The remote users are responsible for their own equipment.
The company does not supply laptops, cell phones, etc to our remote users.
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 10:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
I'm sure there are much better ways, but we just make our users bring their
laptops in periodically for updates. We don't provide desktops to anyone for
home use.
John Hornbuckle
MIS Department
Taylor County School District
www.taylor.k12.fl.us
-Original Message-
From: Joseph
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Joseph Heaton jhea...@dfg.ca.gov wrote:
How do you guys manage remote users' machines?
Most of our laptop users come in the main office on a regular basis
-- usually every day. We treat those laptops basically the same as
desktops, for the most part.
We've
ditto
-Original Message-
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 11:18 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Remote, on-the-road users
I'm sure there are much better ways, but we just make our users bring
their laptops
option (a)
Cheers
Ken
-Original Message-
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 13 April 2010 11:12 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Remote, on-the-road users
Can't SCCM 2007 manage clients over HTTPS?
I assume that DirectAccess is designed to help
So you have remote users, who are employees of your company, who don't use
company computing equipment? Interesting...
John Aldrich jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com 4/13/2010 8:15 AM
I don't. Period. The remote users are responsible for their own equipment.
The company does not supply laptops,
We have scientists, and game wardens, who don't come into offices. They go
straight out into the field, which in our case, is really in the fields...
John Hornbuckle john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us 4/13/2010 8:17 AM
I'm sure there are much better ways, but we just make our users bring their
And these in the field users, which is what I have here... their machines are
not actually part of your network, correct? Not members of the domain?
Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com 4/13/2010 8:18 AM
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Joseph Heaton jhea...@dfg.ca.gov wrote:
How do you guys
: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 11:56 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Remote, on-the-road users
So you have remote users, who are employees of your company, who don't use
company computing equipment? Interesting...
John Aldrich jaldr
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Joseph Heaton jhea...@dfg.ca.gov wrote:
And these in the field users, which is what I have here... their machines
are not actually part of your network, correct? Not members of the domain?
Incorrect. Sorry, I should have mentioned that. Our field users
a smart phone, at which time I'll bill the
company for the data portion of the plan. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 11:56 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Remote, on-the-road users
So you have remote users
18 matches
Mail list logo
