RE: SAN EOL

2009-08-05 Thread paul chinnery
Thanks for the reply and thanks to you also, Brian. Must be age...seven years just doesn't last as long as it used to when I was in school. From: egold...@gmail.com To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: SAN EOL Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:46:56 -0400 well, 5 yea

RE: SAN EOL

2009-08-05 Thread Erik Goldoff
well, 5 years is geriatric nowadays for computer storage, *especially* supporting spinning spindles at the version of technology they were issued with Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, & Security _ From: paul chinnery [mailto:pdw1...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday,

RE: SAN EOL

2009-08-05 Thread Martin Blackstone
I was going to say the same thing. From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 11:12 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SAN EOL HP definitely does. 7 years asset lifecycle seems pretty reasonable to me. Thanks, Brian Desmond br

RE: SAN EOL

2009-08-05 Thread Brian Desmond
HP definitely does. 7 years asset lifecycle seems pretty reasonable to me. Thanks, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com c - 312.731.3132 From: paul chinnery [mailto:pdw1...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 1:00 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: SAN EOL I found out today that