RE: SUBINACL never seems to return to a prompt

2008-09-11 Thread Michael B. Smith
System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SUBINACL never seems to return to a prompt From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: SUBINACL never seems to return to a prompt . I suspect you aren't waiting long enough. grin, but that is your answer to EVERYTHING! J

RE: SUBINACL never seems to return to a prompt

2008-09-09 Thread Andy Ognenoff
Or reboot three times… Whoa! My mouse just moved! Love that video...  - Andy O. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~

RE: SUBINACL never seems to return to a prompt

2008-09-09 Thread Michael . Leone
Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/08/2008 01:54:59 PM: Takes about 10 minutes to process locally. I suspect you aren?t waiting long enough. So here's another test. Apparently, SubInACL enumerates everything it finds, so the more files/sub-directories, the longer it takes: On

Re: SUBINACL never seems to return to a prompt

2008-09-09 Thread James Rankin
I've always found fileacl to be a bit more reliable than subinacl is now...I think the comment earlier on about broken versions of subinacl is dead right 2008/9/9 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/08/2008 01:54:59 PM: Takes about 10 minutes to process

Re: SUBINACL never seems to return to a prompt

2008-09-09 Thread Michael . Leone
James Rankin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/09/2008 09:51:23 AM: I've always found fileacl to be a bit more reliable than subinacl is now...I think the comment earlier on about broken versions of subinacl is dead right Perhaps. But this is the latest version of SubInACL; I have verified

Re: SUBINACL never seems to return to a prompt

2008-09-09 Thread Kurt Buff
Fileacl has a premier place in my toolbox. Love it. On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:51 AM, James Rankin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've always found fileacl to be a bit more reliable than subinacl is now...I think the comment earlier on about broken versions of subinacl is dead right 2008/9/9

RE: SUBINACL never seems to return to a prompt - MORE

2008-09-09 Thread Michael . Leone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/09/2008 09:15:29 AM: Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/08/2008 01:54:59 PM: Takes about 10 minutes to process locally. I suspect you aren?t waiting long enough. So here's another test. Apparently, SubInACL enumerates everything it

RE: SUBINACL never seems to return to a prompt

2008-09-08 Thread Michael B. Smith
Did you download the latest subinacl from Microsoft.com/downloads? The one in the support tools and resource kit is broken. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday,

RE: SUBINACL never seems to return to a prompt

2008-09-08 Thread Michael . Leone
Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/08/2008 01:18:04 PM: Did you download the latest subinacl from Microsoft.com/downloads? The one in the support tools and resource kit is broken. Should be. The .exe says 6/11/2004 ... I can try downloading again, I suppose Z:\PHA

RE: SUBINACL never seems to return to a prompt

2008-09-08 Thread Michael B. Smith
, September 08, 2008 1:41 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SUBINACL never seems to return to a prompt Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/08/2008 01:18:04 PM: Did you download the latest subinacl from Microsoft.com/downloads? The one in the support tools and resource kit

RE: SUBINACL never seems to return to a prompt

2008-09-08 Thread Michael . Leone
Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/08/2008 01:46:14 PM: Yes, it is the most recent, but why did you strip your problem description? I always strip out the parts of the email that aren't necessarily concerned with my comments in a specific email. I will include the description

RE: SUBINACL never seems to return to a prompt

2008-09-08 Thread Michael B. Smith
Takes about 10 minutes to process locally. I suspect you aren't waiting long enough. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 12:58 PM To: NT System

RE: SUBINACL never seems to return to a prompt

2008-09-08 Thread Webster
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: SUBINACL never seems to return to a prompt . I suspect you aren't waiting long enough. grin, but that is your answer to EVERYTHING! J At least you didn't tell him to wait 2 hours! Webster ~ Finally, powerful

RE: SUBINACL never seems to return to a prompt

2008-09-08 Thread Andy Shook
Or reboot three times... Whoa! My mouse just moved! Shook From: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 2:48 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SUBINACL never seems to return to a prompt From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: SUBINACL

RE: SUBINACL never seems to return to a prompt

2008-09-08 Thread Michael . Leone
Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/08/2008 01:54:59 PM: Takes about 10 minutes to process locally. I suspect you aren?t waiting long enough. Really? 10 minutes for 1 directory? Just to display ownership? I have a few dozen folders I need to eventually take ownership of, and