Yes - that is the only back out plan.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 11:48 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Schema upgrade/rollback
I'm not worried in the least
Subject: RE: Schema upgrade/rollback
Yes - that is the only back out plan.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]mailto:[mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 11
*Subject:* RE: Schema upgrade/rollback
** **
I’m not worried in the least, my fellow non-AD educated folks have
paranoia about what happens if something breaks so I have to give them an
answer. I told them simply a forest restore.
** **
*From:* Brian Desmond [mailto:br
know at least
when we do stand up the first 2K8 DC it's unlikely a new GPO setting
will break things.
From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 8:50 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Schema upgrade/rollback
Yes - that is the only back out plan
-schema-updates-lcs-ocs-and-lync.aspx
Dave
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 9:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Schema upgrade/rollback
You *expected* something to break?
ASB
http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker
Harnessing the Advantages
Reverting to snapshot normally bad with DCs due to USN rollback. I've seen it
done, but I wouldn't want to try my luck. A sandboxed test environment is the
way to go.
---Blackberried
-Original Message-
From: David Lum david@nwea.org
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 19:32:14
To: NT System
http://blogs.technet.com/b/janelewis/archive/2009/05/12/schema-what-is-the-best-practise-for-updating.aspx
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
http://www.CarlWebster.comhttp://www.carlwebster.com/
From: David Lum david@nwea.orgmailto:david@nwea.org
Reply-To: NT
Wouldn't it be wise to power down all of the members computer in the
domain, too?
Kurt
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:32 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
In this day and age of VM’s, what would be the simplest way to test and
possibly roll back a schema extension? Would this work?
1.
Reverting to snapshot tends to nuke the time stamps. Nuking timestamps
tosses you into host isolation mode. Host isolation mode is bad, time
consuming and painful.
We have a full lab (with a restored AD environment) where we do testing and
once it's in production, we open a ticket with MS is
.
From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 1:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Schema upgrade/rollback
http://blogs.technet.com/b/janelewis/archive/2009/05/12/schema-what-is-the-best-practise-for-updating.aspx
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix
the difference is he'd only have one dc online until he was sure which schema
version he was using.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Rankin, James R
Sent: 6/8/2012 3:17 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Schema upgrade/rollback
Reverting to snapshot
What is it that you fear will happen that this proposed process will protect
you from?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 2:32 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Schema
/rollback
the difference is he'd only have one dc online until he was sure which schema
version he was using.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Rankin, James R
Sent: 6/8/2012 3:17 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Schema upgrade/rollback
Reverting to snapshot
Issues
Subject: RE: Schema upgrade/rollback
What is it that you fear will happen that this proposed process will protect
you from?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.commailto:br...@briandesmond.com
w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent
14 matches
Mail list logo
