for it (my experience anyway).
From: Neil Standley [mailto:n...@net-venture.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 2:23 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: TS server recommendations
That’s why I brought my question here, I apparently have no idea what I’m doing
J…..
We’re big
of a few vendors he’s
shopping.
Thanks to all for your help, it’s been very helpful. Now I have to go revise
my quote!!!
Neil
From: Benjamin Zachary - Lists [mailto:li...@levelfive.us]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 10:32 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: TS
Too much disk, the ts should be treated like a workstation, prone to failure
due to user error. Everything in my documents should be redirected to a file
share so your drive space is quite minimal 30-40gb or so.
That's also overkill for TS and 20 users by a long shot. I have a server
like that
access more memory.
>
> -Brian
>
>
> --
> *From:* Neil Standley [mailto:n...@net-venture.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 27, 2009 12:42 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: TS server recommendations
>
> Hi Cameron,
>
>
>
> I have to b
memory.
-Brian
From: Neil Standley [mailto:n...@net-venture.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 12:42 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: TS server recommendations
Hi Cameron,
I have to believe those are not concurrent users, are they? What
-venture.com]
Sent: 27 January 2009 19:20
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: TS server recommendations
Thanks Matthew,
The sku I got from our licensing vendor says the OS is 2008 with downgrade
option to 2K3, I understand TS Web is 2K8 only but do you know if there are any
differences for
...@excaliburfilms.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 1:41 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: TS server recommendations
+1
I have a Dual quad core xeon 2.8 with 4GB RAM on Windows 2003.
1 - 2 X 73GB SCSI (RAID 1)
1 - 2 X 146GB SCSI (RAID1)
25 users right now...
CPU 5
.
Thanks,
Neil
From: Matthew Bullock [mailto:mbull...@root9.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 10:17 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: TS server recommendations
Check out Windows 2008 and TS Web to publish only the Applications through a
browser. I would also go with 15000 RPM
coo...@aurico.com>
From: Neil Standley [mailto:n...@net-venture.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 12:42 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: TS server recommendations
Hi Cameron,
I have to believe those are not concurrent users, are they? What kind of
drives and raid controller a
Issues
Subject: RE: TS server recommendations
where will their documents be stored, on the TS or on a File Server ... if on a
File Server, you may want to ensure multiple NICs, and use Gigabit to backplane
the servers, that way the TS will get speed to the file server and not have to
compete with
: Matthew Bullock [mailto:mbull...@root9.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 10:17 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: TS server recommendations
Check out Windows 2008 and TS Web to publish only the Applications through a
browser. I would also go with 15000 RPM SAS drives.
mb
FYI If you are going with 8GB ram then you will have to use 2003 Server ENT
edition or 64 bit. I would stay away from 64 bit server for terminal services.
James Forbis, MCSE, CNE, CCA, CNS
4BIS.COM, Inc.
11491 Gideon Ln.
Cincinnati, OH 45249
PH (513)469-7887
FAX (513)469-7887
Cell (513)200-407
Hi Cameron,
I have to believe those are not concurrent users, are they? What kind of
drives and raid controller are you using?
Neil
From: Cameron Cooper [mailto:ccoo...@aurico.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 10:19 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: TS server
Cooper [mailto:ccoo...@aurico.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 10:19 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: TS server recommendations
Neil,
That will be more than enough. We have a TS server here that has a 1.6GHz
Xeon, with 4GB and RAID 0 and have about 50 users that can access
where will their documents be stored, on the TS or on a File Server ... if
on a File Server, you may want to ensure multiple NICs, and use Gigabit to
backplane the servers, that way the TS will get speed to the file server and
not have to compete with other workstation traffic. You'll probably not
Check out Windows 2008 and TS Web to publish only the Applications
through a browser. I would also go with 15000 RPM SAS drives.
mb
From: Neil Standley [mailto:n...@net-venture.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 10:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: TS server recommendations
Neil,
That will be more than enough. We have a TS server here that has a
1.6GHz Xeon, with 4GB and RAID 0 and have about 50 users that can access
it at any given point. Would recommend making sure that the HD size is
big enough for all of the user files that get created.
---__
17 matches
Mail list logo
