Re: Video conferencing solutions

2010-12-07 Thread Kevin Lundy
Livemeeting with web cams can do this. On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Eric Brouwer ithelp.e...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings, We are a management company managing 20+ properties and conduct weekly conference calls with them. We'd like to start adding video. Is there an inexpensive way to

RE: Video conferencing solutions

2010-12-07 Thread Miller, Michael
, 2010 11:23 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Video conferencing solutions Livemeeting with web cams can do this. On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Eric Brouwer ithelp.e...@gmail.commailto:ithelp.e...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings, We are a management company managing 20+ properties

Re: Video conferencing solutions

2010-12-07 Thread Roger Wright
We went with MegaMeeting for our monthly branch office meetings. Their Pro Lite product allows us to have unlimited one-to-many or many-to-many video conferences, and Desktop/Application sharing is an included option. The interface isn't as elegant as WebEx but it's only about $15/month per

RE: Video Conferencing software via webcam

2009-04-01 Thread Michael B. Smith
I know absolutely NOTHING about this company other than I was reading about it today and it sounds pretty cool. http://www.dimdim.com/ They offer free conferencing for up to 20 folks and meet your stated requirements. From: Bryan Garmon

Re: Video Conferencing software via webcam

2009-04-01 Thread Bryan Garmon
excellent - thanks I'll look into this option On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Michael B. Smith mich...@owa.smithcons.com wrote: I know absolutely NOTHING about this company other than I was reading about it today and it sounds pretty cool. http://www.dimdim.com/ They offer free

Re: Video Conferencing software via webcam

2009-04-01 Thread Bryan Garmon
[mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:27 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Video Conferencing software via webcam I know absolutely NOTHING about this company other than I was reading about it today and it sounds pretty cool. http://www.dimdim.com

RE: Video Conferencing software via webcam

2009-04-01 Thread Cliff Partlow
machine. Once I had all three working it has been painless to help clients. From The Sunny Side Of The Street! Cliff P. -Original Message- From: Bryan Garmon [mailto:bryan.gar...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 9:27 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Video Conferencing

RE: Video Conferencing software via webcam

2009-04-01 Thread Steven M. Caesare
would never load... things that shouldn't happen once you get connectivity to the system. -sc -Original Message- From: Bryan Garmon [mailto:bryan.gar...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 12:37 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Video Conferencing software via webcam well

RE: Video Conferencing

2008-10-13 Thread andy
. Yep, H.323. Fingers working faster than the brain... Yes, this setup would greatly simplify things! -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:27 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Video Conferencing

RE: Video Conferencing

2008-10-02 Thread Jeff Wilhelm
to view (just one at a time). From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 4:22 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Video Conferencing Yes I know you can run video with livemeeting or webex...but can you get return video? ie with webcams? I also took

Re: Video Conferencing

2008-10-01 Thread Doug Hampshire
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:27 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Video Conferencing That would be H.323, I believe, and yes, you are correct. If it were me doing this (and it is, I just haven't gotten to it yet), I'd put the Polycom

RE: Video Conferencing

2008-09-30 Thread Roger Wright
We had good success with Yugma. I don't think we're still using it, but when we did the service and presentation tools were more than adequate and the service is certainly affordable. https://www.yugma.com/forbusiness/business.php Roger Wright Network Administrator Evatone, Inc.

RE: Video Conferencing

2008-09-30 Thread EricB
+1 Unless you have a newer firewall that understands H.232 traffic, it will not play nice with the newer Polycom stuff. -Original Message- From: Mike French [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Video Conferencing

RE: Video Conferencing

2008-09-30 Thread Krishna Reddy
To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Video Conferencing +1 Unless you have a newer firewall that understands H.232 traffic, it will not play nice with the newer Polycom stuff. -Original Message- From: Mike French [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:14 PM

Re: Video Conferencing

2008-09-30 Thread Sherry Abercrombie
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:22 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Video Conferencing +1 Unless you have a newer firewall that understands H.232 traffic, it will not play nice with the newer Polycom stuff. -Original Message- From

Re: Video Conferencing

2008-09-30 Thread Kurt Buff
:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Video Conferencing How about www.polycom.com Used them at a client site, had good results. Just make sure your firewall will play nice with whatever you choose... From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Video Conferencing

2008-09-30 Thread EricB
Whoops. Yep, H.323. Fingers working faster than the brain... Yes, this setup would greatly simplify things! -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:27 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Video Conferencing That would

RE: Video Conferencing

2008-09-30 Thread Mike French
How about www.polycom.com Used them at a client site, had good results. Just make sure your firewall will play nice with whatever you choose... From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:07 PM To: NT System Admin

Re: Video Conferencing

2008-09-30 Thread Kevin Lundy
! -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:27 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Video Conferencing That would be H.323, I believe, and yes, you are correct. If it were me doing this (and it is, I just

Re: Video Conferencing

2008-09-30 Thread Steve Ens
: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:27 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Video Conferencing That would be H.323, I believe, and yes, you are correct. If it were me doing this (and it is, I just haven't gotten to it yet), I'd

Re: Video Conferencing

2008-09-30 Thread Kevin Lundy
. Fingers working faster than the brain... Yes, this setup would greatly simplify things! -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 3:27 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Video Conferencing That would

RE: Video conferencing

2008-06-19 Thread Bob Fronk
Free?? = Netmeeting? If you are still on XP, click Start, Run and type Conf. Otherwise I would suggest Office Communication Server. Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Kirk Woloshyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 12:55 PM To: NT System Admin Issues