RE: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

After the Australia Situation it adds a whole new meaning to "Wet Bar". -Original Message- From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 10:27 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: widescreen vs "standard" monitors O

Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

:dangerw...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 22, 2011 10:38 AM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors > > > > And then added the wet bar? > > - WJR > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 09:23, Steven M. Caesare &g

RE: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

Of course not. I knew EXACTLY where the wet bar was going, and built the rest of the basement around that. -sc From: William Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 10:38 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: widescreen vs "standard" monito

Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

g angle was... > > -sc > > > -Original Message- > > From: Guyer, Don [mailto:don.gu...@fiserv.com] > > Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 10:27 AM > > To: NT System Admin Issues > > Subject: RE: widescreen vs "standard" monitors > > > > Our 50&qu

RE: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

uary 18, 2011 10:27 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: widescreen vs "standard" monitors > > Our 50" is viewed from about 7'-8' away and seems to be just about perfect. > Any larger/closer and you'd feel like you were in the first few rows

Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

gt; live without them! > > > > BF > > > > *From:* Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, February 18, 2011 12:38 PM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: widescreen vs "standard" monitors > > > > Yep, overki

RE: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

I have three 27” monitors for my workstation. I am not sure how I could live without them! BF From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 12:38 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: widescreen vs "standard" monitors Yep, overkill … I have a

RE: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

ime event ! ' From: Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 12:24 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors Regarding that calculation indication 2.5 times the diagonal size of the screen...I guess it would be overki

Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

Regarding that calculation indication 2.5 times the diagonal size of the screen...I guess it would be overkill to get a 32" LG as my pc monitor. :) 63" Panny Plasma here and I'm about 8-10 feet away. Perfection. On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Andrew S. Baker wrote: > LOL > > Thanks, I re

Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

LOL Thanks, I really worked on it. *ASB *(Find me online via About.Me ) *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... * On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:39 AM, William Robbins wrote: > We all experience "middle age spread" ASB, nothing to concern yourself

Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

Winner, winner, chicken dinner! :) - WJR On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:23, Bill Humphries wrote: > That's what she said. > > > Andrew S. Baker wrote: > >> I prefer widescreen monitors these days. More going on horizontally than >> vertically for me, most of the time. [1] >> >> >> *ASB *(Find m

Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

That's what she said. Andrew S. Baker wrote: I prefer widescreen monitors these days. More going on horizontally than vertically for me, most of the time. [1] *ASB *(Find me online via About.Me ) *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... [1] Don't

Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

t; > From: William Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:16 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors > > Now I know I'm just looking for fault...but c'mon...WTF says they like a > URL? &

RE: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

Thanks, Erik..that's good to know. -Original Message- From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:18 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: widescreen vs "standard" monitors I've usually gone by the rule of optimum viewi

RE: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

Ok...how about this.. I like the page indicated by that URL. ;-) From: William Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:16 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors Now I know I'm just looking for fault...but c

RE: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

ss, not a one time event ! ' -Original Message- From: Cameron Cooper [mailto:ccoo...@aurico.com] Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 10:28 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: widescreen vs "standard" monitors Depends on the room size and how far the TV will be from the couch. _

Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

:20 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors > > http://www.amazon.com/gp/feature.html?ie=UTF8&docId=121501 > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:17 AM, John Aldrich > wrote: > Oh, I definitely intend to get a widescreen TV, just w

Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

800-523-7282 x 1673 >>> Fax: 610-293-4499 >>> www.fiserv.com >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Cameron Cooper [mailto:ccoo...@aurico.com] >>> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 10:28 AM >>> To: NT System Admin Issues >>> Su

RE: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

Thanks! I like that URL! :-) From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 10:20 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors http://www.amazon.com/gp/feature.html?ie=UTF8&docId=121501 On Fri, Feb 18, 20

Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

t; Fax: 610-293-4499 >> www.fiserv.com >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Cameron Cooper [mailto:ccoo...@aurico.com] >> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 10:28 AM >> To: NT System Admin Issues >> Subject: RE: widescreen vs "standard" monitors &

Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

> Fax: 610-293-4499 > www.fiserv.com > > -Original Message- > From: Cameron Cooper [mailto:ccoo...@aurico.com] > Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 10:28 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: widescreen vs "standard" monitors > > Depends on the

Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

We all experience "middle age spread" ASB, nothing to concern yourself with. ;) By the way, nice move with the subtle foot note. - WJR On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:14, Andrew S. Baker wrote: > I prefer widescreen monitors these days. More going on horizontally > than vertically for me, most

RE: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

om Office: 1-800-523-7282 x 1673 Fax: 610-293-4499 www.fiserv.com -Original Message- From: Cameron Cooper [mailto:ccoo...@aurico.com] Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 10:28 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: widescreen vs "standard" monitors Depends on the room size and h

Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

gt; -Original Message- > From: Jonathan [mailto:ncm...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 9:58 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors > > Don't recall the discussion, but I know that a 19" widescreen has >

RE: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

[mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com] Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 9:18 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: widescreen vs "standard" monitors Oh, I definitely intend to get a widescreen TV, just was wondering if there were a "magic formula" for figuring out what size TV/m

Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

> equivalent viewing size... :-) > > > > From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 10:09 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors > > That's another discussion altogether,

RE: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors That's another discussion altogether, and one that has been largely decided with the move to HD.  If you expect a TV to last more than a few years, get a widescreen.  End of discussion.   On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:0

Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

I prefer widescreen monitors these days. More going on horizontally than vertically for me, most of the time. [1] *ASB *(Find me online via About.Me ) *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage... [1] Don't hurt yourselves... * On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at

Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

, 2011 9:58 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors > > Don't recall the discussion, but I know that a 19" widescreen has > roughly the same vertical space of a 17" "standard" (what is that, 4:3 > aspect ra

Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

I will say a 22" wide screen with a minimum of 1680x1050 res, stood up in portrait mode is dynamite for code work, or anything that approximates the printed page (web browsing, anyone). Many of our tax users have three monitors (when taking into account the notebook monitor), and they leave one in

RE: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

011 9:58 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors Don't recall the discussion, but I know that a 19" widescreen has roughly the same vertical space of a 17" "standard" (what is that, 4:3 aspect ratio?). My OPINION, based on expe

Re: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

Don't recall the discussion, but I know that a 19" widescreen has roughly the same vertical space of a 17" "standard" (what is that, 4:3 aspect ratio?). My OPINION, based on experience, because I have deployed a lot of both standard and widescreen monitors is this: If you work with lots of big sp

RE: widescreen vs "standard" monitors

I don't remember the discussion, but surely resolution is the determining factor, rather than monitor size? A 24" 640x480 res screen is going to display exactly the same as 12" 640x480 res screen. There's a diagram of resolutions here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Display_resolution Cheers Ken