System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SUBINACL never seems to return to a prompt
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SUBINACL never seems to return to a prompt
. I suspect you aren't waiting long enough.
grin, but that is your answer to EVERYTHING! J
Or reboot three times
Whoa! My mouse just moved!
Love that video...
- Andy O.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/08/2008
01:54:59 PM:
Takes about 10 minutes to process locally. I suspect you aren?t
waiting long enough.
So here's another test. Apparently, SubInACL enumerates everything it
finds, so the more files/sub-directories, the longer it takes:
On
I've always found fileacl to be a bit more reliable than subinacl is now...I
think the comment earlier on about broken versions of subinacl is dead
right
2008/9/9 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/08/2008
01:54:59 PM:
Takes about 10 minutes to process
James Rankin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/09/2008 09:51:23 AM:
I've always found fileacl to be a bit more reliable than subinacl is
now...I think the comment earlier on about broken versions of
subinacl is dead right
Perhaps. But this is the latest version of SubInACL; I have verified
Fileacl has a premier place in my toolbox. Love it.
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:51 AM, James Rankin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've always found fileacl to be a bit more reliable than subinacl is now...I
think the comment earlier on about broken versions of subinacl is dead
right
2008/9/9
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/09/2008 09:15:29 AM:
Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on
09/08/2008 01:54:59 PM:
Takes about 10 minutes to process locally. I suspect you aren?t
waiting long enough.
So here's another test. Apparently, SubInACL enumerates everything
it
Further to my post about scripting .. I've been advised to use SUBINACL,
rather than XCACLS.VBS. But that, too, isn't returning to a prompt
==
Z:\subinacl.exe /subdirectories \\server\users\user /display=owner
+File \\server\users\user
/owner
, September 08, 2008 12:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SUBINACL never seems to return to a prompt
Further to my post about scripting .. I've been advised to use SUBINACL,
rather than XCACLS.VBS. But that, too, isn't returning to a prompt
==
Z:\subinacl.exe
Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/08/2008
01:18:04 PM:
Did you download the latest subinacl from Microsoft.com/downloads?
The one in the support tools and resource kit is broken.
Should be. The .exe says 6/11/2004 ...
I can try downloading again, I suppose
Z:\PHA
, September 08, 2008 1:41 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SUBINACL never seems to return to a prompt
Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/08/2008
01:18:04 PM:
Did you download the latest subinacl from Microsoft.com/downloads?
The one in the support tools and resource kit
Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/08/2008
01:46:14 PM:
Yes, it is the most recent, but why did you strip your problem
description?
I always strip out the parts of the email that aren't necessarily
concerned with my comments in a specific email. I will include the
description
Admin Issues
Subject: SUBINACL never seems to return to a prompt
Further to my post about scripting .. I've been advised to use SUBINACL,
rather than XCACLS.VBS. But that, too, isn't returning to a prompt
==
Z:\subinacl.exe /subdirectories \\server\users\user
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SUBINACL never seems to return to a prompt
. I suspect you aren't waiting long enough.
grin, but that is your answer to EVERYTHING! J
At least you didn't tell him to wait 2 hours!
Webster
~ Finally, powerful
Or reboot three times... Whoa! My mouse just moved!
Shook
From: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 2:48 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: SUBINACL never seems to return to a prompt
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SUBINACL
Michael B. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/08/2008
01:54:59 PM:
Takes about 10 minutes to process locally. I suspect you aren?t
waiting long enough.
Really? 10 minutes for 1 directory? Just to display ownership?
I have a few dozen folders I need to eventually take ownership of, and
16 matches
Mail list logo