Re: Size of this NT admin list

es of Technology for the SMB market… On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Rod Trent < rodtr...@myitforum.com > wrote: Over 50%. From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto: asbz...@gmail.com ] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 11:39 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Size of this NT

Re: Size of this NT admin list

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:33 PM, John Cook wrote: LOL. What is this, a vote? >>> All in favor say aye. >>  Nay. > So you're a nay sayer. I'm just voting against this being a vote. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

RE: Size of this NT admin list

First rule of the other list: You do not talk about the other list. BF From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 3:59 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Size of this NT admin list We - I MEAN THEY - are all on a separate list

Re: Size of this NT admin list

:27 -0800 Subject: Re: Size of this NT admin list > On a side note, I got this as a Christmas present: > > http://www.amazon.com/More-Than-Complete-Hitchhikers-Guide/dp/0681403225/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1326917582&sr=8-1 > > > Chris Bodnar, MCSE, MCITP > Techni

Re: Size of this NT admin list

So you're a nay sayer. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership for Strong Families - Original Message - From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 04:49 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Size of this NT admin list On Wed, Jan 18,

Re: Size of this NT admin list

ssues > *Subject:* RE: Size of this NT admin list > > ** ** > > Only the important ones J > > ** ** > > Joe Heaton > > ITB – Windows Server Support > > ** ** > > *From:* David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] > *Sent:* Wednesday, Januar

Re: Size of this NT admin list

Some times it's 43 :) On Jan 18, 2012 2:34 PM, "David Lum" wrote: > Anyone know how many people are subscribed to this list? > > *David Lum* > Systems Engineer // NWEATM > Office 503.548.5229 //* *Cell (voice/text) 503.267.9764 > > ** ** > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'

Re: Size of this NT admin list

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:28 PM, John Cook wrote: >> LOL. What is this, a vote? > > All in favor say aye. Nay. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: h

RE: Size of this NT admin list

But he asked how many, not what kind... From: Heaton, Joseph@DFG [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 10:39 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Size of this NT admin list Only the important ones :) Joe Heaton ITB - Windows Server Support From: David Lum

Re: Size of this NT admin list

From:* David Lum [mailto:david....@nwea.org] >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 18, 2012 8:31 AM >>> *To:* Heaton, Joseph@DFG; NT System Admin Issues >>> *Subject:* Size of this NT admin list >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Anyone know how m

RE: Size of this NT admin list

ns.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 1:25 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Size of this NT admin list Just for my information, what's the size of the Exchange list? Thanks for the details! Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchang

Re: Size of this NT admin list

gt;> >>> ** ** >>> >>> *From:* David Lum [mailto:david....@nwea.org] >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 18, 2012 8:31 AM >>> *To:* Heaton, Joseph@DFG; NT System Admin Issues >>> *Subject:* Size of this NT admin list >>> >>

Re: Size of this NT admin list

nsurance Company of America Email: christopher_bod...@glic.com Phone: 610-807-6459 Fax: 610-807-6003 From: Manuel Santos To: "NT System Admin Issues" Date: 01/18/2012 01:23 PM Subject: Re: Size of this NT admin list 42, indeed! 2012/1/18 Heaton, Joseph@DFG Only the impo

RE: Size of this NT admin list

: Size of this NT admin list Well now it's 29 and that can't be right either. On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Richard Stovall mailto:rich...@gmail.com>> wrote: +1 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:34 AM, James Rankin mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com>> wrote: > 28 > > > O

Re: Size of this NT admin list

CSE, MCP+I, MCTS, CompTIA A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 > > > -Original Message- > From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 11:49 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Size of this NT admin list > > +1 > > On W

Re: Size of this NT admin list

-Original Message- > From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] > Sent: 18 January 2012 16:49 > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Size of this NT admin list > > +1 > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:34 AM, James Rankin wrote: >> 28 >> >>

Re: Size of this NT admin list

+1 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Steven Peck wrote: > Well now it's 29 and that can't be right either. > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Richard Stovall wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:34 AM, James Rankin >> wrote: >> > 28 >> > >> > >> > On 18 January 2012 16:30, David

RE: [dkim-failure] Re: Size of this NT admin list

29 is the new 42 From: Steven Peck [mailto:sep...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 10:07 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: [dkim-failure] Re: Size of this NT admin list Well now it's 29 and that can't be right either. On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Richard Stovall m

Re: Size of this NT admin list

, Rod Trent wrote: > Over 50%. > > ** ** > > *From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 18, 2012 11:39 AM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Size of this NT admin list > > ** ** > > And 50% of them ar

Re: Size of this NT admin list

LOL * * *ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market… * On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Ben Scott wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Andrew S. Baker > wrote: > > And 50% of them are lurkers. :) > > And 40% of them are out-of-o

Re: Size of this NT admin list

On 1/18/2012 11:39 AM, Jeff Brown wrote: I would have guessed MUCH higher. Go figure. Like 42? LOL *From:*James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, January 18, 2012 10:34 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Size of this NT admin list 28 ~ Finally, powerful

Re: Size of this NT admin list

Ex england goalkeeper? Sent from my SR-71 Blackbird -Original Message- From: Bob Fronk Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:01:42 To: NT System Admin Issues Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues" Subject: RE: Size of this NT admin list LOL.. I always wondered who David James is

RE: Size of this NT admin list

They also camp out in parks. From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 1:01 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Size of this NT admin list Sounds right, 1% of the folks actually post. From: Donald Bittenbender [mailto:donald.bittenben

RE: Size of this NT admin list

Aye From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 1:00 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Size of this NT admin list LOL. What is this, a vote? From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sca...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 8:49 AM To: NT System

RE: Size of this NT admin list

, 2012 1:00 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Size of this NT admin list LOL. What is this, a vote? From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sca...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 8:49 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Size of this NT admin list 42 From: David Lum [mailto:david

RE: Size of this NT admin list

rodtr...@myitforum.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 12:33 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Size of this NT admin list Over 50%. From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 11:39 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Size of this NT admin

Re: Size of this NT admin list

More like 95% *From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 18, 2012 8:39 AM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Size of this NT admin list > > > > And 50% of them are lurkers. :) > > *ASB* > > *http://XeeMe.

RE: Size of this NT admin list

Sorry. I'm SLOW like that... From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 11:10 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Size of this NT admin list So would I, if I'd been being anywhere remotely serious. On 18 January 2012 16:39, Jeff Brown

Re: Size of this NT admin list

e Heaton >> >> ITB – Windows Server Support >> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] >> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 18, 2012 8:31 AM >> *To:* Heaton, Joseph@DFG; NT System Admin Issues >> *Subject:* Size of this NT admin lis

Re: Size of this NT admin list

42 -- Espi On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:30 AM, David Lum wrote: > Anyone know how many people are subscribed to this list? > > *David Lum* > Systems Engineer // NWEATM > Office 503.548.5229 //* *Cell (voice/text) 503.267.9764 > > ** ** > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'

RE: Size of this NT admin list

ystem Admin Issues Subject: RE: Size of this NT admin list Official count looks to be 3,489 members. 365 members are held due to minor issues that may/may not resolve with email communication / spam blocking. Due to the Lyris SMTP rater limiter, that's why you'll sometimes see a del

Re: Size of this NT admin list

Well now it's 29 and that can't be right either. On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Richard Stovall wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:34 AM, James Rankin > wrote: > > 28 > > > > > > On 18 January 2012 16:30, David Lum wrote: > >> > >> Anyone know how many people are subscribed to this l

RE: Size of this NT admin list

, January 18, 2012 11:49 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Size of this NT admin list +1 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:34 AM, James Rankin wrote: > 28 > > > On 18 January 2012 16:30, David Lum wrote: >> >> Anyone know how many people are subscribed to this list? &g

RE: Size of this NT admin list

System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Size of this NT admin list +1 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:34 AM, James Rankin wrote: > 28 > > > On 18 January 2012 16:30, David Lum wrote: >> >> Anyone know how many people are subscribed to this list? >> >> David Lum >

RE: Size of this NT admin list

LOL.. I always wondered who David James is From: Mike Hoffman [mailto:m...@drumbrae.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 11:43 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Size of this NT admin list Does that include the guy who's face appears on the LinkedIn pane in Outlook? I thoug

RE: Size of this NT admin list

Sounds right, 1% of the folks actually post. From: Donald Bittenbender [mailto:donald.bittenben...@gfi.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 8:47 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Size of this NT admin list Official count looks to be 3,489 members. 365 members are held due to minor

RE: Size of this NT admin list

LOL. What is this, a vote? From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sca...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 8:49 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Size of this NT admin list 42 From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]<mailto:[mailto:david@nwea.org]> Sent: Wednesday, January 18

Re: Size of this NT admin list

+1 HHGTTG !!! On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Don Ely wrote: > Silly, everyone knows it's 42 > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:34 AM, James Rankin wrote: > >> 28 >> >> >> On 18 January 2012 16:30, David Lum wrote: >> >>> Anyone know how many people are subscribed to this list? >>> >>> *Da

Re: Size of this NT admin list

It's a very active list which made me think there were a lot more subscribers - doh!   Don K From: Jonathan Link To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 10:40 AM Subject: Re: Size of this NT admin list Almost a moot question.

RE: Size of this NT admin list

Over 50%. From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 11:39 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Size of this NT admin list And 50% of them are lurkers. :) ASB http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the

RE: Size of this NT admin list

I never make these lists. From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 11:40 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Size of this NT admin list At least two: me and you. Carl Webster Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional http

Re: Size of this NT admin list

y Professional > > http://www.CarlWebster.com <http://www.carlwebster.com/> > > From: David Lum > Reply-To: NT Issues > Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:30:58 +0000 > To: NT Issues > Subject: Size of this NT admin list > >Anyone know how many people are subscribed to this li

Re: Size of this NT admin list

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Andrew S. Baker wrote: > And 50% of them are lurkers. :) And 40% of them are out-of-office at any given time. ;-) -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ ~ ---

RE: Size of this NT admin list

Hey, I resemble that statement *grin* From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 8:39 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Size of this NT admin list And 50% of them are lurkers. :) ASB http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker Harnessing the Advantages of

Re: Size of this NT admin list

> *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Size of this NT admin list > > ** ** > > 28 > > On 18 January 2012 16:30, David Lum wrote: > > Anyone know how many people are subscribed to this list? > > *David Lum* > Systems Engineer // NW

Re: Size of this NT admin list

o:* Heaton, Joseph@DFG; NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Size of this NT admin list > > ** ** > > Anyone know how many people are subscribed to this list? > > *David Lum* > Systems Engineer // NWEATM > Office 503.548.5229 //* *Cell (voice/text) 503.267.9764***

Re: Size of this NT admin list

+1 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Don Ely wrote: > Silly, everyone knows it's 42 > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:34 AM, James Rankin wrote: >> >> 28 >> >> >> On 18 January 2012 16:30, David Lum wrote: >>> >>> Anyone know how many people are subscribed to this list? >>> >>> David Lum >>> Syst

Re: Size of this NT admin list

Sorry, I was counting just contributors, not lurkers too On 18 January 2012 16:38, Don Ely wrote: > Silly, everyone knows it's 42 > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:34 AM, James Rankin wrote: > >> 28 >> >> >> On 18 January 2012 16:30, David Lum wrote: >> >>> Anyone know how many people are subscri

Re: Size of this NT admin list

+1 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:34 AM, James Rankin wrote: > 28 > > > On 18 January 2012 16:30, David Lum wrote: >> >> Anyone know how many people are subscribed to this list? >> >> David Lum >> Systems Engineer // NWEATM >> Office 503.548.5229 // Cell (voice/text) 503.267.9764 >> >> >> >> ~ Final

RE: Size of this NT admin list

42 From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 10:31 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Size of this NT admin list Anyone know how many people are subscribed to this list? David Lum Systems Engineer // NWEATM Office 503.548.5229 // Cell (voice/text

RE: Size of this NT admin list

y, January 18, 2012 11:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Size of this NT admin list 28 On 18 January 2012 16:30, David Lum mailto:david@nwea.org>> wrote: Anyone know how many people are subscribed to this list? David Lum Systems Engineer // NWEATM Office 503.548.5229 // Cell

Re: Size of this NT admin list

42 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:30 AM, David Lum wrote: > Anyone know how many people are subscribed to this list? > > *David Lum* > Systems Engineer // NWEATM > Office 503.548.5229 //* *Cell (voice/text) 503.267.9764 > > ** ** > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resourc

RE: Size of this NT admin list

Does that include the guy who's face appears on the LinkedIn pane in Outlook? I thought it was at least 32! Mike From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: 18 January 2012 16:34 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Size of this NT admin list 28 On 18 January 2012 16:30,

Re: Size of this NT admin list

Almost a moot question. It's easily searchable, so the audience is possibly quite a bit larger than the subscribers. On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:30 AM, David Lum wrote: > Anyone know how many people are subscribed to this list? > > *David Lum* > Systems Engineer // NWEATM > Office 503.548.522

Re: Size of this NT admin list

012 16:30:58 + To: NT Issues mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>> Subject: Size of this NT admin list Anyone know how many people are subscribed to this list? ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Busine

Re: Size of this NT admin list

And 50% of them are lurkers. :) * * *ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market… * On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:34 AM, James Rankin wrote: > 28 > > > On 18 January 2012 16:30, David Lum wrote: > >> Anyone know how many people are subscribed

RE: Size of this NT admin list

I would have guessed MUCH higher. Go figure. From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 10:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Size of this NT admin list 28 On 18 January 2012 16:30, David Lum mailto:david@nwea.org>> wrote: Anyone kn

RE: Size of this NT admin list

Only the important ones :) Joe Heaton ITB - Windows Server Support From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 8:31 AM To: Heaton, Joseph@DFG; NT System Admin Issues Subject: Size of this NT admin list Anyone know how many people are subscribed to this list

Re: Size of this NT admin list

Silly, everyone knows it's 42 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:34 AM, James Rankin wrote: > 28 > > > On 18 January 2012 16:30, David Lum wrote: > >> Anyone know how many people are subscribed to this list? >> >> *David Lum* >> Systems Engineer // NWEATM >> Office 503.548.5229 //* *Cell (voice/text

Re: Size of this NT admin list

28 On 18 January 2012 16:30, David Lum wrote: > Anyone know how many people are subscribed to this list? > > *David Lum* > Systems Engineer // NWEATM > Office 503.548.5229 //* *Cell (voice/text) 503.267.9764 > > ** ** > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~