Agreed and keep any network/other devices on their own UPS not your server
UPS. Other than that Kurt nailed it as usual.
Jon
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 15:58, Jim von Stein wrote:
> > I rather desparately need to replace my aged and not-very-ef
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 15:58, Jim von Stein wrote:
> I rather desparately need to replace my aged and not-very-effective rack
> UPSs. Non-profit status and deferred maintenance are sort of synonymous, but
> it's time. What's considered best practice in a mixed virtual/physical
> environment: one
I rather desparately need to replace my aged and not-very-effective rack
UPSs. Non-profit status and deferred maintenance are sort of synonymous,
but it's time. What's considered best practice in a mixed
virtual/physical environment: one big UPS per rack, or separate
(smaller) UPSs for each physica
