1 12:24 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: VMware vSphere 5 Licensing and Pricing Update
My post didn't mean to suggest or infer any deficiencies in VMware's QA
process. And VMware doesn't necessarily need to be deficient when releasing an
update after GA which may addr
:
>>>
>>>> There must be an extremely urgent business reason why you have to go
>>>> to a GA release of a major platform upgrade (vSphere 5) instead of
>>>> waiting for update 1 of said release.
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, August 18,
stone
>>> wrote:
>>> > It sounds to me like they are talking about the reporting features and
>>> they will offer a standalone reporting tool for now. From: Ben N [mailto:
>>> bennordlan...@gmail.com]
>>> > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 5:11 PM
>
er a standalone reporting tool for now. From: Ben N [mailto:
>> bennordlan...@gmail.com]
>> > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 5:11 PM
>> > To: NT System Admin Issues
>> > Subject: Re: VMware vSphere 5 Licensing and Pricing Update So... what
>> does this mean? we
:
> bennordlan...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 5:11 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: Re: VMware vSphere 5 Licensing and Pricing Update So... what
> does this mean? we have to wait for an update to v5 before this new vRAM
> entitlement is
ing features and they
> will offer a standalone reporting tool for now. From: Ben N
> [mailto:bennordlan...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 5:11 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: VMware vSphere 5 Licensing and Pricing Update So... what does
> this mean? w
gns to capitalize on this, and are now going 'oh, crap..." :)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Andrew S. Baker"
> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 17:58:02
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues"
> Subject: Re: Fw: VMware vSphere 5 Licensi
Wednesday, August 03, 2011 7:01 PM
>>
>> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>> *Subject:* Re: VMware vSphere 5 Licensing and Pricing Update
>>
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> I agree. I've seen it used way too often by many organizations.
>>
>>
; *From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 03, 2011 7:01 PM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: VMware vSphere 5 Licensing and Pricing Update
>
> ** **
>
> I agree. I've seen it used way too often by many organizations
Gary Slinger" <
>>> gary.slin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > I like how their competition will have been spooling up marketing
>>> campaigns to capitalize on this, and are now going 'oh, crap..." :)
>>> >
>>> > -Original Mes
m*: Jonathan Link
> *To*: NT System Admin Issues
> *Sent*: Thu Aug 04 11:59:23 2011
>
> *Subject*: Re: Fw: VMware vSphere 5 Licensing and Pricing Update
>
> It may still happen. When the mob is stirred things happen.
>
> On Thursday, August 4, 2011, John Cook wrote:
> >
hip for Strong Families
>
> From: Sean Martin mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com>>
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>>
> Sent: Thu Aug 04 11:48:40 2011
> Subject: Re: VMware vSphere 5 Licensing and Prici
n Martin
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Sent: Thu Aug 04 11:48:40 2011
> Subject: Re: VMware vSphere 5 Licensing and Pricing Update
>
> Good timing too...otherwise VMWorld may have been nothing but torches and
pitchforks.
>
> - Sean
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Andre
I was looking forward to the Keynote Lynching!
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families
From: Sean Martin
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Thu Aug 04 11:48:40 2011
Subject: Re: VMware vSphere 5 Licensing and Pricing Update
Good timing
2 260160
From: Jonathan [mailto:ncm...@gmail.com]
Sent: 03 August 2011 23:03
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Fw: VMware vSphere 5 Licensing and Pricing Update
Gary, you beat me to the punch! I was just getting ready to send that to the
list as well.
Bottom line, the vRAM entitlement pe
3 Aug 2011 17:58:02
> > To: NT System Admin Issues<
> ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>
> > Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues" <
> ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>
> > Subject: Re: Fw: VMware vSphere 5 Licensing and Pricing Update
> >
>
Your tin foil is in the corner, sir.
-Original Message-
From: Sean Martin
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 16:36:13
To: NT System Admin Issues
Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues"
Subject: Re: VMware vSphere 5 Licensing
and Pricing Update
I find it a little hard to believe that VMWar
is, and are now going 'oh, crap..." :)
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: "Andrew S. Baker"
> > Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 17:58:02
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues"
> > Subjec
ing
campaigns to capitalize on this, and are now going 'oh, crap..." :)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Andrew S. Baker"
> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 17:58:02
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues"
> Subject: Re: Fw:
VMware Team
> To: Gary Slinger
> ReplyTo: The VMware Team
> Subject: VMware vSphere 5 Licensing and Pricing Update
> Sent: Aug 3, 2011 17:40
>
> View this email on mobile devices | View the online version
> VMware vSphere 5 Licensing & Pricing Update Dear VMware Partner,
>
Issues"
Subject: Re: Fw: VMware vSphere 5 Licensing and Pricing Update
Yep, I need to review it this week...
I like how all these companies can spin "We just through up a dumb idea and
now have to backtrack" to "we listened to our customers and partners, and
decided
Gary Slinger
> ReplyTo: The VMware Team
> Subject: VMware vSphere 5 Licensing and Pricing Update
> Sent: Aug 3, 2011 17:40
>
> View this email on mobile devices | View the online version
> VMware vSphere 5 Licensing & Pricing Update Dear VMware Partner,
> On July 12, 2011,
Now that it's public, this may be of interest, given the gnashing of teeth
recently.
G
--Original Message--
From: The VMware Team
To: Gary Slinger
ReplyTo: The VMware Team
Subject: VMware vSphere 5 Licensing and Pricing Update
Sent: Aug 3, 2011 17:40
View this email on mobile de
23 matches
Mail list logo
