RE: Windows 7 edition comparison

at using 64-bit where we can, but we have a sizeable number of PCs that will run 32-bit only, so we'll end up with a mix. -Malcolm -Original Message- From: Peter van Houten [mailto:peter...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 9:45 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Windows

Re: Windows 7 edition comparison

pu and drive speeds. > > > > Win7 although has many similar functions just ‘feels’ better to most people > that I have running it now. FWIW > > > > *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Sunday, July 26, 2009 2:34 PM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues

RE: Windows 7 edition comparison

Sunday, July 26, 2009 2:34 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 edition comparison All laptops are now Vista and most of my desktops. We will go with 7 as soon as I have time to finish testing and it is released. Most will be moved to x64 if 1) the hardware supports it and 2) if

Re: Windows 7 edition comparison

All laptops are now Vista and most of my desktops. We will go with 7 as soon as I have time to finish testing and it is released. Most will be moved to x64 if 1) the hardware supports it and 2) if they don't give me an issue to do the install. I hope to reclaim some of the resources lost to Vist

RE: R: Windows 7 edition comparison

++ Used it since beta 2, although my experiences of Windows 7 are that it seems to be a much better OS thus far From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com] Sent: 26 July 2009 18:00 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: R: Windows 7 edition comparison + On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 11

Re: R: Windows 7 edition comparison

gt; *A:* NT System Admin Issues > *Oggetto:* Re: Windows 7 edition comparison > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~

R: Windows 7 edition comparison

4 bit if you can afford. GuidoElia HELPPC _ Da: Eric Wittersheim [mailto:eric.wittersh...@gmail.com] Inviato: domenica 26 luglio 2009 14.12 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Windows 7 edition comparison I will be skipping Vista as well at work. At home on the other hand I have

Re: Windows 7 edition comparison

list for next year's budget so we'll be > skipping Vista. All XP clients here...no Vista. > > Bill Lambert > Concuity > 847-941-9206 > > > > -Original Message- > From: Cameron Cooper [mailto:ccoo...@aurico.com] > > Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 10:06 A

Re: Windows 7 edition comparison

just for the sake of being able to call it “new”.   -sc   From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2009 7:28 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 edition comparison   I also am skipping Vista...does anyone else have the same

RE: Windows 7 edition comparison

Saturday, July 25, 2009 7:28 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 edition comparison I also am skipping Vista...does anyone else have the same feeling as me with changing to Windows 7/2008 Server, that MS let XP/2003 bed in for so long that we all hate the changes? I don't r

Re: Windows 7 edition comparison

From: Cameron Cooper [mailto:ccoo...@aurico.com] > Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 10:06 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Windows 7 edition comparison > > We will start the move to Windows 7 sometime in 2010, otherwise all XP here > with one Vista machine. > >

RE: Windows 7 edition comparison

So you DON'T find him satisfying when you drop the soap. Gotcha. -sc -Original Message- From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com] Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 5:54 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 edition comparison Um...No. -Original Me

RE: Windows 7 edition comparison

Eyes watering? Oh yes... that DOES sting. -sc From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 5:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Windows 7 edition comparison The question that will really get your eyes watering is wondering who

RE: Windows 7 edition comparison

Um...No. -Original Message- From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 3:45 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 edition comparison So let me get this straight... you wanted it to say: "Michael Espinola is pretty useful

Re: Windows 7 edition comparison

7 edition comparison I'm still laughing. It took me a good 2 minutes to compose myself enough to type... -Original Message- From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 1:45 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 edition compariso

RE: Windows 7 edition comparison

I'm still laughing. It took me a good 2 minutes to compose myself enough to type... -Original Message- From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 1:45 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 edition comparison So let me get

Re: Windows 7 edition comparison

oap."? > > Wow. > > -sc > > > -Original Message- > > From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com] > > Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 4:35 PM > > To: NT System Admin Issues > > Subject: RE: Windows 7 edition comparison > &g

RE: Windows 7 edition comparison

OK Tonto. -sc > -Original Message- > From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] > Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 4:38 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Windows 7 edition comparison > > That joke just as weak as your deodorant. Fail. > >

RE: Windows 7 edition comparison

n Issues > Subject: RE: Windows 7 edition comparison > > What he forget to add was "whenever I drop the soap..." > TVK > > -Original Message- > From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] > Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 3:05 PM > To: NT System Admin

RE: Windows 7 edition comparison

Jealous much??? ;-) -Original Message- From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 3:38 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 edition comparison That joke just as weak as your deodorant. Fail. Shook -Original Message- From

RE: Windows 7 edition comparison

That joke just as weak as your deodorant. Fail. Shook -Original Message- From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com] Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 4:35 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 edition comparison What he forget to add was "whenever I drop the

RE: Windows 7 edition comparison

What he forget to add was "whenever I drop the soap..." TVK -Original Message- From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 3:05 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 edition comparison You forgot to say "YMMV

Re: Windows 7 edition comparison

That wasn't a second edition, it was the sequel... -- Peter van Houten On the 24/07/2009 21:59, Ben Scott wrote the following: On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Steven M. Caesare wrote: The Michael Espinola version windows flat *sucked*. Fortunately, the second edition (ME2) is pretty use

RE: Windows 7 edition comparison

You forgot to say "YMMV" or "IMO" -sc > -Original Message- > From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 4:00 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Windows 7 edition comparison > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2

Re: Windows 7 edition comparison

On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Steven M. Caesare wrote: > The Michael Espinola version windows flat *sucked*. Fortunately, the second edition (ME2) is pretty useful. ;-) -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

RE: Windows 7 edition comparison

The Michael Espinola version windows flat *sucked*. Especially when he would start thunking. -sc > -Original Message- > From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 1:37 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Windows 7 edi

RE: Windows 7 edition comparison

] Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 9:45 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Windows 7 edition comparison With the impending move of the Windows world to version 7, I thought it would be prudent for the list to discuss this. In addition, most of us would use a Windows desktop, in one form or other, on a

RE: Windows 7 edition comparison

Subject: RE: Windows 7 edition comparison > -Original Message- > From: Peter van Houten [mailto:peter...@gmail.com] > Subject: Windows 7 edition comparison > > With the impending move of the Windows world to version 7, I thought it > would be prudent for the list t

RE: Windows 7 edition comparison

> -Original Message- > From: Peter van Houten [mailto:peter...@gmail.com] > Subject: Windows 7 edition comparison > > With the impending move of the Windows world to version 7, I thought it > would be prudent for the list to discuss this. In addition, most of us >

RE: Windows 7 edition comparison

it is supposed to be!) -Original Message- From: Don Guyer [mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com] Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 10:59 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 edition comparison We are still an XP client shop, with about 1% of the systems running Vista. I envision us going right

RE: Windows 7 edition comparison

min Issues Subject: Windows 7 edition comparison With the impending move of the Windows world to version 7, I thought it would be prudent for the list to discuss this. In addition, most of us would use a Windows desktop, in one form or other, on a personal system to access and/or administer corpora

RE: Windows 7 edition comparison

-2746 MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I, A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4 -Original Message- From: Peter van Houten [mailto:peter...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 10:45 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Windows 7 edition comparison With the impending move of the Windows world to version 7, I thought it

RE: Windows 7 edition comparison

xroach.com] Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 9:59 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 edition comparison We are still an XP client shop, with about 1% of the systems running Vista. I envision us going right to Win 7. Don Guyer Systems Engineer - Information Services Prudential, Fox &

RE: Windows 7 edition comparison

min Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 edition comparison We will start the move to Windows 7 sometime in 2010, otherwise all XP here with one Vista machine. _ Cameron Cooper IT Director - CompTIA A+ Certified Aurico Reports, Inc Phone: 847-890-4021    Fax: 847-255

RE: Windows 7 edition comparison

AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 edition comparison We will start the move to Windows 7 sometime in 2010, otherwise all XP here with one Vista machine. _ Cameron Cooper IT Director - CompTIA A+ Certified Aurico Reports, Inc Phone: 847-890-4021

RE: Windows 7 edition comparison

: Don Guyer [mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com] Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 9:59 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 edition comparison We are still an XP client shop, with about 1% of the systems running Vista. I envision us going right to Win 7. Don Guyer Systems Engineer

RE: Windows 7 edition comparison

n.gu...@prufoxroach.com -Original Message- From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 10:50 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Windows 7 edition comparison Currently support XP on systems we roll out. Allow Vista for systems researchers buy on their

RE: Windows 7 edition comparison

:peter...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 10:45 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Windows 7 edition comparison > > With the impending move of the Windows world to version 7, I thought it > would be prudent for the list to discuss this. In addition, most of us > would us

Windows 7 edition comparison

With the impending move of the Windows world to version 7, I thought it would be prudent for the list to discuss this. In addition, most of us would use a Windows desktop, in one form or other, on a personal system to access and/or administer corporate servers/networks. Off the top of my head, qu