Matthew Trentacoste wrote:
> Hey. I'm trying to get numpy up and running on SuSE 10.1 and not
> having much luck.
>
> I've been working with 1.0b2 and can get it to install without any
> errors, but can't do anything with it. I run a local install of
> python 2.4.3 just to keep out of whate
Matthew Trentacoste wrote:
> Hey. I'm trying to get numpy up and running on SuSE 10.1 and not
> having much luck.
>
> I've been working with 1.0b2 and can get it to install without any
> errors, but can't do anything with it. I run a local install of
> python 2.4.3 just to keep out of whate
Hey. I'm trying to get numpy up and running on SuSE 10.1 and not
having much luck.
I've been working with 1.0b2 and can get it to install without any
errors, but can't do anything with it. I run a local install of
python 2.4.3 just to keep out of whatever weirdness gets installed on
my m
Hey. I'm trying to get numpy up and running on SuSE 10.1 and not
having much luck.
I've been working with 1.0b2 and can get it to install without any
errors, but can't do anything with it. I run a local install of
python 2.4.3 just to keep out of whatever weirdness gets installed on
my m
Hey. I'm trying to get numpy up and running on SuSE 10.1 and not
having much luck.
I've been working with 1.0b2 and can get it to install without any
errors, but can't do anything with it. I run a local install of
python 2.4.3 just to keep out of whatever weirdness gets installed on
my m
Building an arpack extension turned out to be surprisingly simple. For
example for dsaupd:
f2py -c dsaupd.f -m dsaupd -L/usr/lib/blas/atlas:/usr/lib/lapack/atlas
-llapack -lblas -larpack
It took me a long time to get the command down to something that
simple. Took me a while even to figure out I
Hey. I'm trying to get numpy up and running on SuSE 10.1 and not
having much luck.
I've been working with 1.0b2 and can get it to install without any
errors, but can't do anything with it. I run a local install of
python 2.4.3 just to keep out of whatever weirdness gets installed on
my m
On 8/15/06, Ethan T Coon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,The following line:f2py -c -m _test --include_paths ./include test.f
Typing f2py alone seems to indicate the syntax should be
f2py -I./include [other args] test.f
I tried this and it seems to work here.
-
Hi!
numpy renamed the *function* abs to absolute.
Most functions like mean, min, max, average, ...
have an equivalent array *method*.
Why is absolute left out ?
I think it should be added .
Furthermore, looking at some line of code that have multiple calls to
absolute [ like f(absolute(a), abso
David Grant wrote:
> Where can I find the Extension module now? In the f2py documentation,
> the following import is used:
>
> from scipy_distutils.core import Extension
>
> but that doesn't work, and I read that this was moved into numpy along
> with f2py. I can't seem to find it anywhere. What'
Where can I find the Extension module now? In the f2py documentation,
the following import is used:
from scipy_distutils.core import Extension
but that doesn't work, and I read that this was moved into numpy along
with f2py. I can't seem to find it anywhere. What's the current way of
doing this?
Hi all,
The following line:
f2py -c -m _test --include_paths ./include test.f
(where test.f contains the line " include 'test_inc.h' " and
'test_inc.h' exists in the directory './include' )
results in the errors:
--
running buil
Steve Schmerler wrote:
> The test in
>
> In [2]: numpy.__version__
> Out[2]: '1.0b2.dev3007'
>
> fails:
>
>
> [...]
> check_1D_array (numpy.lib.tests.test_shape_base.test_vstack) ... ok
> check_2D_array (numpy.lib.tests.test_shape_base.test_vstack) ... ok
> check_2D_array2 (numpy.lib.tests.test_sha
The test in
In [2]: numpy.__version__
Out[2]: '1.0b2.dev3007'
fails:
[...]
check_1D_array (numpy.lib.tests.test_shape_base.test_vstack) ... ok
check_2D_array (numpy.lib.tests.test_shape_base.test_vstack) ... ok
check_2D_array2 (numpy.lib.tests.test_shape_base.test_vstack) ... ok
==
> Torgil Svensson wrote:
>> Shouldn't power() and the ** operator return the same result for matrixes?
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Christopher Barker apparently wrote:
> no, but the built-in pow() should -- does it?
The "try it and see" approach says that it does.
Cheers,
Alan Isaac
---
Does site.cfg actually work? I ask because I want to test numpy (and soon scipy) against ATLAS 3.7.13. For simplicity I used the "make install" with that distribution, which puts the files in /usr/local/atlas/lib, /usr/local/atlas/include, and so on. No problem, so I created a
site.cfg in the n
16 matches
Mail list logo