[Numpy-discussion] 1.0b5 build failure

2006-09-09 Thread Neal Becker
Fedora FC5 linux, with BLAS, LAPACK, ATLAS, FFTW compile options: '-Ibuild/src.linux-x86_64-2.4/numpy/core/src -Inumpy/core/include -Ibuild/src.linux-x86_64-2.4/numpy/core -Inumpy/core/src -Inumpy/core/include -I/usr/include/python2.4 -c' gcc: numpy/core/src/multiarraymodule.c numpy/core/src/mul

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.0b5 build failure

2006-09-09 Thread Neal Becker
Sorry, actually that's today's numpy svn - not 1.0b5. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebS

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 1.0b5 build failure

2006-09-09 Thread Fernando Perez
On 9/9/06, Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, actually that's today's numpy svn - not 1.0b5. Make sure you have a clean build environment, the current SVN builds just fine on my Dapper 6.06 box; I just rebuilt it a second ago. Cheers, f ps. Here's my little build script, which I us

Re: [Numpy-discussion] rfft different in numpy vs scipy

2006-09-09 Thread Steven G. Johnson
Andrew Jaffe wrote: > numpy returns n/2+1 complex numbers (so the first and last numbers are > actually real) with the frequencies equivalent to the positive part of > the fftfreq, whereas scipy returns n real numbers with the frequencies > as in rfftfreq (i.e., two real numbers at the same frequen