Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy RC1 build blows up -- IGNORE

2006-09-25 Thread listservs
Ignore this query -- silly mistake on my part. Sorry. On Sep 25, 2006, at 2:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've just tried building RC1 on OSX 10.4 (Intel), and it fails > almost immediately. This did not fail in the past with beta5 or > from SVN: > > Osoyoos:~/Development/numpy-1.0rc1 chr

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy RC1 build blows up

2006-09-25 Thread Robert Kern
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've just tried building RC1 on OSX 10.4 (Intel), and it fails almost > immediately. This did not fail in the past with beta5 or from SVN: It looks like a problem on your end: > gcc: installation problem, cannot exec `cc1': No such file or directory Can you build any

[Numpy-discussion] Numpy RC1 build blows up

2006-09-25 Thread listservs
I've just tried building RC1 on OSX 10.4 (Intel), and it fails almost immediately. This did not fail in the past with beta5 or from SVN: Osoyoos:~/Development/numpy-1.0rc1 chris$ python setup.py build Running from numpy source directory. F2PY Version 2_3198 blas_opt_info: FOUND: extra_li

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy types --> Numeric typecodes map?

2006-09-25 Thread Travis Oliphant
Francesc Altet wrote: >El dl 25 de 09 del 2006 a les 11:08 -0600, en/na Travis Oliphant va >escriure: > > >>Francesc Altet wrote: >> >> >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>Anybody know if there is a map between NumPy types and Numeric >>>typecodes? Something like 'typecodes' for numarray: >>> >>> Oh, yo

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy types --> Numeric typecodes map?

2006-09-25 Thread Francesc Altet
El dl 25 de 09 del 2006 a les 11:08 -0600, en/na Travis Oliphant va escriure: > Francesc Altet wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >Anybody know if there is a map between NumPy types and Numeric > >typecodes? Something like 'typecodes' for numarray: > > > > > How about > > dtype(obj).char? This doesn't work

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy types --> Numeric typecodes map?

2006-09-25 Thread Travis Oliphant
Francesc Altet wrote: >Hi, > >Anybody know if there is a map between NumPy types and Numeric >typecodes? Something like 'typecodes' for numarray: > > How about dtype(obj).char? -Travis - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influenc

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy types --> Numeric typecodes map?

2006-09-25 Thread Francesc Altet
Hi, Anybody know if there is a map between NumPy types and Numeric typecodes? Something like 'typecodes' for numarray: >>> numarray.typecode {'UInt64': 'U', 'Int32': 'i', 'Int16': 's', 'Float64': 'd', 'Object': 'O', 'UInt8': 'b', 'UInt32': 'u', 'Complex64': 'D', 'UInt16': 'w', 'Bool': 'B', 'Compl

Re: [Numpy-discussion] please restore the way dtype prints to original version

2006-09-25 Thread Travis Oliphant
Christopher Hanley wrote: > Hi, > > Change set 3213 changed the data type printing with an array from > something like dtype=int64 to dtype='int64'. Although this is a small > cosmetic change it has broken all of the doctests I have written for > numpy code. I was changing the way dtypes print

[Numpy-discussion] Negative division and numpy scalars

2006-09-25 Thread Francesc Altet
Hi, I have been bitten by a subtlety in numpy scalar divisions. The next exposes the issue: >>> -1/20 -1 >>> Numeric.array([-1])[0] / Numeric.array([20])[0] -1 >>> numarray.array([-1])[0] / numarray.array([20])[0] -1 >>> numpy.array([-1])[0] / numpy.array([20])[0] 0 After some digging, I've foun

[Numpy-discussion] Downcasting to smallest storage

2006-09-25 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, I am sorry if I have missed anything obvious here, but is there a fast simple way to downcast an array to the smallest storage that hold array data within a specified precision - e.g. a = array([1.0]) small_a = fantasy_function(a, rtol=1.0001e-05, atol=1e-08 ) b = array([1.2]) sm

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 無料

2006-09-25 Thread miho
:―― INFORMATION ―: 不正・悪質なサイトを一切排除しておりますので 安心してご利用ください。 http://love-match.bz/pc/?09 :――: *・゜゜・*:.。. .。.:*・゜゜・*:.。..。:*・゜゜・*:.。..。:**・゜゜・* お金と時間を持て余している人妻の間で、噂になってるあのサイト   [登録・利用料全て無料] http://love-match.bz/pc/?09 ━

[Numpy-discussion] please restore the way dtype prints to original version

2006-09-25 Thread Christopher Hanley
Hi, Change set 3213 changed the data type printing with an array from something like dtype=int64 to dtype='int64'. Although this is a small cosmetic change it has broken all of the doctests I have written for numpy code. I expect that I am not the only person this change has caught. Please

[Numpy-discussion] Fixes to numexpr string support

2006-09-25 Thread Ivan Vilata i Balaguer
Hi all, these are just a couple of small fixes to the string support in Numexpr, and a test case for the string copy operation. For the base patches: 1.http://www.mail-archive.com/numpy-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01551.html 2.http://www.mail-archive.com/numpy-discussion@lists.sourceforge