[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Python 2.5 is installed, and I have installed Apple's Developer's
> Tools (i.e. the package "December 2002 Mac OS X Developer Tools").
By the way, this is *really* old. Long before there were Universal binaries
(which is what Python 2.5 is). I believe you will want to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> gcc: _configtest.c
> gcc: cannot specify -o with -c or -S and multiple compilations
> gcc: cannot specify -o with -c or -S and multiple compilations
> failure.
You're using OS X 10.3.9? There is a bug in distutils on that platform. It was
fixed in Python's trunk, but I'm
Siterer Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm sorry if this might seem like a stupid question to some of you,
>> but I have been struggling for the better part of the afternoon trying
>> to install NumPy on my G4 iBook, so I hope somebody can take the time
>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm sorry if this might seem like a stupid question to some of you,
> but I have been struggling for the better part of the afternoon trying
> to install NumPy on my G4 iBook, so I hope somebody can take the time
> to lend me a helping hand. I have searched
Hi,
I'm sorry if this might seem like a stupid question to some of you,
but I have been struggling for the better part of the afternoon trying
to install NumPy on my G4 iBook, so I hope somebody can take the time
to lend me a helping hand. I have searched a little in the mail
archives and
On 11/4/06, Mike C. Fletcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We wouldn't be able to get rid
> of the abstraction mechanism entirely, as we would still have data-types
> such as lists-of-lists-of-integers that wouldn't support the protocol.
>
Perhaps this will sound stupid, but I was thinking about e
Colin J. Williams wrote:
> Tim Hochberg wrote:
> [snip]
>
>> A style note: please use the named dtypes (int32, uint32, etc) rather
>> than the old-style letter codes; the former is much clearer. The answer
>> to your question might have been immediately apparent had you been
>> using named d
On 11/3/06, Torgil Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> class struct_type(Structure):
> _fields_ = []
>
> ...
> ... which is somewhat static in nature. How do you create "structures"
> dynamically?
>
You can put the above in a function that takes fields as an argument, or
type('struc
Josh Marshall wrote:
> On 11/31/06, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Fernando Perez wrote:
>> ps - one more thing. This guy:
>>
>> http://blog.vrplumber.com/
>>
>> has been rewriting the OpenGL bindings using ctypes, and I've seen
>> posts from him about numpy (in his blog). He
Tim Hochberg wrote:
[snip]
> A style note: please use the named dtypes (int32, uint32, etc) rather
> than the old-style letter codes; the former is much clearer. The answer
> to your question might have been immediately apparent had you been
> using named dtypes.
>
>
+1
> Personally, I'd
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent has not yet been delivered to one or more of its
recipients after more than 72 hours on the queue on
externalmx-1.sourceforge.net.
The message identifier is: 1GfAoO-0007im-Sh
The subject of the message i
11 matches
Mail list logo
