Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problem converting a numarray extension to numpy

2006-07-25 Thread Paul Barrett
On 7/24/06, Travis Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Barrett wrote: > > I'm having a problem converting a C extension module that was > > originally written for numarray to use numpy. I using swig to create > > a wrapper flle f

[Numpy-discussion] Problem converting a numarray extension to numpy

2006-07-22 Thread Paul Barrett
I'm having a problem converting a C extension module that was originally written for numarray to use numpy. I using swig to create a wrapper flle for the C code. I have added the numpy.get_numarray_include() method to my setup.py file and have changed the numarray/libnumarray.h to use numpy/libnu

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Args for rand and randn: call for a vote

2006-07-08 Thread Paul Barrett
On 7/8/06, Ed Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Last week's discussion on rand() and randn() seemed to indicate a > sentiment that they ought to take tuples for consistency with ones, > zeros, eye, identity, and empty -- that, although they are supposed > to be convenience functions, they ar

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Call for a vote on .M .A .T .H attributes

2006-07-07 Thread Paul Barrett
On 7/7/06, Travis Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is a call for a vote on each of the math attributes. Please post > your vote as > > +1 : support > +0 : don't care so go ahead > -0 : don't care so why do it > -1 : against > > Vote on the following issues separately: > > > > 1) .T

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0 (fwd)

2006-06-30 Thread Paul Barrett
On 6/30/06, Louis Cordier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > While it is hard to read too much into numbers, this tells me that there > > are about 10,000 current users of Numeric/Numarray who have not even > > *tried* NumPy. In fact, Numarray downloads of 1.5.1 went up > > significantly from its ea