Re: [Numpy-discussion] Rationale for atleast_3d

2006-09-22 Thread Bill Baxter
Thanks for the explanations, folks, I thought that might be the case. On 9/23/06, Sebastian Haase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm working with "stacks of 2d arrays" -- but I was always under the > impression that -- since the last axis is the "fastest" -- "stacks of > " should stack in the first

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Rationale for atleast_3d

2006-09-22 Thread Sebastian Haase
On Friday 22 September 2006 12:57, Travis Oliphant wrote: > Bill Baxter wrote: > >26 weeks, 4 days, 2 hours and 9 minutes ago, Zdeněk Hurák asked why > >atleast_3d acts the way it does: > >http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/4382/match=atle > >ast+3d > > > >He doesn't seem to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Rationale for atleast_3d

2006-09-22 Thread Robert Kern
Travis Oliphant wrote: > Bill Baxter wrote: > >> 26 weeks, 4 days, 2 hours and 9 minutes ago, Zdeněk Hurák asked why >> atleast_3d acts the way it does: >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/4382/match=atleast+3d >> >> He doesn't seem to have gotten any answers. And now I'

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Rationale for atleast_3d

2006-09-22 Thread Travis Oliphant
Bill Baxter wrote: >26 weeks, 4 days, 2 hours and 9 minutes ago, Zdeněk Hurák asked why >atleast_3d acts the way it does: >http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/4382/match=atleast+3d > >He doesn't seem to have gotten any answers. And now I'm wondering the >same thing. Anyone

[Numpy-discussion] Rationale for atleast_3d

2006-09-22 Thread Bill Baxter
26 weeks, 4 days, 2 hours and 9 minutes ago, Zdeněk Hurák asked why atleast_3d acts the way it does: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/4382/match=atleast+3d He doesn't seem to have gotten any answers. And now I'm wondering the same thing. Anyone have any idea? --bb