On Saturday 24 June 2006 13:12, Pierre GM wrote:
> I haven't really time to double-check/create a patch, tough. Meanwhile,
> Michael, you could just modify your numpy/core/ma.py accordingly.
Hi Pierre,
Thank you for the fix. I checked it out and and numpy now behaves correctly
for 0**1. in mask
Michael,
> Is anyone else seeing this? It should be easy to test. If so, I
> think it's a bug.
Yeah, I see that as well.
In MA.power(a,b), a temporary mask is created, True for values a<=0.
(check L1577 of the sources,
`md = make_mask(umath.less_equal (fa, 0), flag=1)`). The combination of thi
Ping!
Is anyone else seeing this? It should be easy to test. If so, I
think it's a bug.
Best,
Mike
On Jun 21, 2006, at 9:39 PM, Michael Fitzgerald wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I'm encountering some (relatively new?) behavior with masked arrays
> that
> strikes me as bizarre. Raising zero
Hello all,
I'm encountering some (relatively new?) behavior with masked arrays that
strikes me as bizarre. Raising zero to a floating-point value is triggering
a mask to be set, even though the result should be well-defined. When using
fixed-point integers for powers, everything works as exp
