If you like, here's a rand function that takes either a sequence or a tuple. I use this for interactive sessions.def rand(*shape): """ Return an array of the given dimensions which is initialized to
random numbers from a uniform distribution in the range [0,1). rand(d0, d1, ..., dn)
David Grant wrote:
> Thanks everyone. My only question now is why there is random_sample and
> random. My guess is that one is there for compatibility with older
> releases and so I'm not bothered by it.
Yes.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless
On 8/21/06, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David Grant wrote:> I was a bit surprised today to find that numpy.random.rand doesn't> take in a tuple as input for the dimensions of the desired array. I am> very used to using a tuple for zeros, ones. Also, wouldn't this mean
> that it would not
David Grant wrote:
> I was a bit surprised today to find that numpy.random.rand doesn't
> take in a tuple as input for the dimensions of the desired array. I am
> very used to using a tuple for zeros, ones. Also, wouldn't this mean
> that it would not be possible to add other non-keyword arguments
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006, David Grant apparently wrote:
> I was a bit surprised today to find that numpy.random.rand
> doesn't take in a tuple as input for the dimensions of the
> desired array. I am very used to using a tuple for zeros,
> ones. Also, wouldn't this mean that it would not be
> possi
David Grant wrote:
>I was a bit surprised today to find that numpy.random.rand doesn't
>take in a tuple as input for the dimensions of the desired array. I am
>very used to using a tuple for zeros, ones. Also, wouldn't this mean
>that it would not be possible to add other non-keyword arguments to
I was a bit surprised today to find that numpy.random.rand doesn't
take in a tuple as input for the dimensions of the desired array. I am
very used to using a tuple for zeros, ones. Also, wouldn't this mean
that it would not be possible to add other non-keyword arguments to
rand later?
--
David G