On 7/11/06, Travis Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Erin Sheldon wrote:
> > Just tested the lastest SVN and it works as advertised. Thanks
> > Travis.
> >
> > An unrelated question: why does this work for arrays but not recarrays?
> >
> >
> > In [24]: mydescriptor =
> > [('age',float64),('N
Erin Sheldon wrote:
> Just tested the lastest SVN and it works as advertised. Thanks
> Travis.
>
> An unrelated question: why does this work for arrays but not recarrays?
>
>
> In [24]: mydescriptor =
> [('age',float64),('Nchildren',int8),('weight',float32)]
>
> In [25]: a = array([(64,2,75.0)
Just tested the lastest SVN and it works as advertised. Thanks
Travis.
An unrelated question: why does this work for arrays but not recarrays?
In [24]: mydescriptor = [('age',float64),('Nchildren',int8),('weight',float32)]
In [25]: a = array([(64,2,75.0),(25,0,60.0)], dtype=mydescriptor)
John Parejko wrote:
>Howdy! I just wanted to voice my agreement with this statment by Erin Sheldon:
>
> > I brought up the issue a while back of having a simple way to
> > access the field names of an array. The quick summary: accessing
> > field names has some oddness that needs cleaning up.
>
>
John Parejko wrote:
>Howdy! I just wanted to voice my agreement with this statment by Erin Sheldon:
>
> > I brought up the issue a while back of having a simple way to
> > access the field names of an array. The quick summary: accessing
> > field names has some oddness that needs cleaning up.
>
>
Howdy! I just wanted to voice my agreement with this statment by Erin Sheldon:
> I brought up the issue a while back of having a simple way to
> access the field names of an array. The quick summary: accessing
> field names has some oddness that needs cleaning up.
Sometimes a['name'], sometim
Hi everyone -
(sigh) These gmail issues are really annoying...so I apologize
if the gmail version of this message shows up in a few days.
I brought up the issue a while back of having a simple way to
access the field names of an array. The quick summary: accessing
field names has some oddness th
It was suggested that I put off this discussion until we were closer
to the 1.0 release. Perhaps now is a good time to bring it up once
again? The quick summary: accessing field names has some
oddness that needs cleaning up.
On 3/15/06, Travis Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fernando Perez
