Re: [Numpy-discussion] rackspace ssl certificates

2018-06-18 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 5:58 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 12:24 AM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 3:13 PM, Matthew Brett > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:42 PM, Charles R Harris > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > O

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A little about XND

2018-06-18 Thread Marten van Kerkwijk
Hi Stefan, Just to clarify: the ? we propose in the NEP is really for matmul - it indicates a true missing dimension (i.e., the array cannot have outer broadcast dimensions as well). For inner loop broadcasting, I'm proposing a "|1" post-fix, which means a dimension could also be missing, but can

Re: [Numpy-discussion] rackspace ssl certificates

2018-06-18 Thread Matthew Brett
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 12:24 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 3:13 PM, Matthew Brett > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:42 PM, Charles R Harris >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 2:22 PM, Nathan Goldbaum >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> I think Mat

Re: [Numpy-discussion] rackspace ssl certificates

2018-06-18 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 3:13 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:42 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 2:22 PM, Nathan Goldbaum > > wrote: > >> > >> I think Matthew Brett needs to fix this. > > > > > > That would be nice, but I'm not convi

Re: [Numpy-discussion] rackspace ssl certificates

2018-06-18 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:42 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 2:22 PM, Nathan Goldbaum > wrote: >> >> I think Matthew Brett needs to fix this. > > > That would be nice, but I'm not convinced it is helpful :) I note that > latest `apache-libcloud` does not install dir

Re: [Numpy-discussion] rackspace ssl certificates

2018-06-18 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 2:22 PM, Nathan Goldbaum wrote: > I think Matthew Brett needs to fix this. > That would be nice, but I'm not convinced it is helpful :) I note that latest `apache-libcloud` does not install directly on windows, there seem to be some missing dependencies. Chuck

Re: [Numpy-discussion] rackspace ssl certificates

2018-06-18 Thread Nathan Goldbaum
I think Matthew Brett needs to fix this. On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 3:20 PM Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > I've been trying to put out the NumPy 1.15.0rc1, but cannot get > `numpy-wheels` to upload the wheels to rackspace on windows, there is a > certification problem. I note that that requi

[Numpy-discussion] rackspace ssl certificates

2018-06-18 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi All, I've been trying to put out the NumPy 1.15.0rc1, but cannot get `numpy-wheels` to upload the wheels to rackspace on windows, there is a certification problem. I note that that requirement was supposedly disabled: on_success: # Upload the generated wheel package to Rackspace # On Wind

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A little about XND

2018-06-18 Thread Stefan Krah
Hi Marten, On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 12:34:03PM -0400, Marten van Kerkwijk wrote: > That looks quite nice and expressive. In the context of a discussion we > have been having about describing `matmul/@` and possibly broadcastable > dimensions, I think from your description it sounds like one would

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A little about XND

2018-06-18 Thread Marten van Kerkwijk
Hi Stefan, That looks quite nice and expressive. In the context of a discussion we have been having about describing `matmul/@` and possibly broadcastable dimensions, I think from your description it sounds like one would describe `@` with multiple functions (the multiple dispatch we have been (ar

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A little about XND

2018-06-18 Thread Stefan Krah
On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 08:47:02PM -0400, Marten van Kerkwijk wrote: > More of a detailed question, but as we are currently thinking about > extending the signature of gufuncs (i.e., things like `(m,n),(n,p)->(m,p)` > for matrix multiplication), and as you must have thought about this for > libgufu

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A little about XND

2018-06-18 Thread Marten van Kerkwijk
Interesting. If nothing else, it would be a nice way to mark our internal functions, including the loops. It also should not be difficult to have (g)ufunc signatures exported in that way, combining `signature` and `types`. In more detail, I see the grammar clearly allows fixed dimensions in a way