Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal to accept NEP-18, __array_function__ protocol

2018-09-08 Thread Charles R Harris
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 6:27 PM Stephan Hoyer wrote: > I propose to accept NEP-18, "A dispatch mechanism for NumPy’s high level > array functions": > http://www.numpy.org/neps/nep-0018-array-function-protocol.html > > Since the last round of discussion, we added a new section on "Callable > object

Re: [Numpy-discussion] C99

2018-09-08 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 12:24 PM Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 11:02 AM Ralf Gommers > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 6:07 AM Charles R Harris < >> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 12:02 AM Eric Wieser >>> wrote: >>> Th

Re: [Numpy-discussion] C99

2018-09-08 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 11:02 AM Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 6:07 AM Charles R Harris > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 12:02 AM Eric Wieser >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for the first step on this! >>> >>> Should we allow // style comments >>> >>> I don’t think it matter

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A minor milestone

2018-09-08 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 12:03 PM Chris Barker wrote: > There are probably a LOT of Windows users getting numpy from conda as well. > > (I know my CI's and users do...) > > It'd be nice if there was some way to track real usage! > I wonder if the conda folks have some statistics? Chuck

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A minor milestone

2018-09-08 Thread Chris Barker
There are probably a LOT of Windows users getting numpy from conda as well. (I know my CI's and users do...) It'd be nice if there was some way to track real usage! -CHB On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 11:16 PM Andrew Nelson wrote: > >> >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] C99

2018-09-08 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 6:07 AM Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 12:02 AM Eric Wieser > wrote: > >> Thanks for the first step on this! >> >> Should we allow // style comments >> >> I don’t think it matters too much. I think it might be a little messy to >> have a mix of the tw

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A minor milestone

2018-09-08 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 11:16 PM Andrew Nelson wrote: > > but on Travis I install it half a dozen times every day. > > Good point. I wonder if there's any way to take that into account when > considering whether to drop versions. > > On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 at 15:14, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > >> On Fr

Re: [Numpy-discussion] C99

2018-09-08 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 12:02 AM Eric Wieser wrote: > Thanks for the first step on this! > > Should we allow // style comments > > I don’t think it matters too much. I think it might be a little messy to > have a mix of the two styles where // means “post py3” and /* */ means > pre-py3 - but at th