Re: [Numpy-discussion] manylinux upgrade for numpy wheels

Pretty sure the 2010 and 2014 images both have much newer compilers than that. There are still a lot of users on CentOS 6, so I'd still stick to 2010 for now on x86_64 at least. We could potentially start adding 2014 wheels for the other platforms where we currently don't ship wheels – gotta be be

[Numpy-discussion] manylinux upgrade for numpy wheels

Hi All, Thought now would be a good time to decide on upgrading manylinux for the 1.19 release so that we can make sure that everything works as expected. The choices are manylinux1 -- CentOS 5, currently used, gcc 4.2 (in practice 4.5), only supports i

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy Community Meeting Wednesday, Feb. 05

Hi all, There will be a NumPy Community meeting Wednesday February 5 at 11 am Pacific Time. Everyone is invited to join in and edit the work-in- progress meeting topics and notes: https://hackmd.io/76o-IxCjQX2mOXO_wwkcpg?both Best wishes Sebastian signature.asc Description: This is a digitall

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NEP 38 - Universal SIMD intrinsics

—snip— > 1) Once NumPy adds the framework and initial set of Universal Intrinsic, if > contributors want to leverage a new architecture specific SIMD instruction, > will they be expected to add software implementation of this instruction for > all other architectures too? In my opinion, if the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NEP 38 - Universal SIMD intrinsics

Hi everyone, I know had raised these questions in the PR, but wanted to post them in the mailing list as well. 1) Once NumPy adds the framework and initial set of Universal Intrinsic, if contributors want to leverage a new architecture specific SIMD instruction, will they be expected to add

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NEP 38 - Universal SIMD intrinsics

On 04-02-2020 08:08, Matti Picus wrote: > Together with Sayed Adel (cc) and Ralf, I am pleased to put the draft > version of NEP 38 [0] up for discussion. As per NEP 0, this is the next > step in the community accepting the approach layed out in the NEP. The > NEP PR [1] has already garnered a fair

[Numpy-discussion] NEP 38 - Universal SIMD intrinsics

Together with Sayed Adel (cc) and Ralf, I am pleased to put the draft version of NEP 38 [0] up for discussion. As per NEP 0, this is the next step in the community accepting the approach layed out in the NEP. The NEP PR [1] has already garnered a fair amount of discussion about the viability of