Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy FFT normalization options issue (addition of new option)

2020-06-28 Thread Peter Bell
>> Honestly, I don't find "forward" very informative. There isn't any real >> convention on whether FFT of IFFT have any normalization. >> To the best of my experience, either forward or inverse could be normalized >> by 1/N, or each normalized by 1/sqrt(N), or neither >> could be normalized. I

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy FFT normalization options issue (addition of new option)

2020-06-28 Thread Andras Deak
On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 9:37 PM Neal Becker wrote: > > Honestly, I don't find "forward" very informative. There isn't any real > convention on whether FFT of IFFT have any normalization. > To the best of my experience, either forward or inverse could be normalized > by 1/N, or each normalized b

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy FFT normalization options issue (addition of new option)

2020-06-28 Thread Neal Becker
Honestly, I don't find "forward" very informative. There isn't any real convention on whether FFT of IFFT have any normalization. To the best of my experience, either forward or inverse could be normalized by 1/N, or each normalized by 1/sqrt(N), or neither could be normalized. I will say my expe