Dear pals,
It has been a while since the last feedback from the reviewer, could
someone help to review this PR again?
--> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/18562
P.S. this is my first time contributing to numpy : )
-- Forwarded message -
寄件者： Sayantika Banik
Date: 2021年10月
Moved this discussion to an issue:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/20121
Feel free to add your own thoughts and suggestions there.
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 9:11 AM Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 12:11 PM Kevin Sheppard <
> kevin.k.shepp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 12:11 PM Kevin Sheppard
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 7:22 PM Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 7:19 PM Kevin Sheppard <
>> kevin.k.shepp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think the issue in random specifically is that a raw list of
>>> available
Hi,
Maybe a short introduction like this one:
https://albertcthomas.github.io/good-practices-random-number-generators/
could help to get the idea.
Cheers
Carl
Am Fr., 15. Okt. 2021 um 13:51 Uhr schrieb Ilhan Polat :
> As a cosmic coincidence this happened to me yesterday. My goal: generate
> n
As a cosmic coincidence this happened to me yesterday. My goal: generate
n-long arrays of 1s and -1s picked from a uniform distribution to mimic
BLAS function ?LARNV.
Full disclosure: I know a bit about the subject, but I'm not an expert and
too lazy to gather my thoughts about it at the moment be
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 7:22 PM Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 7:19 PM Kevin Sheppard
> wrote:
>
>> I think the issue in random specifically is that a raw list of
>> available functions does not provide suitable guidance for someone looking
>> for random variate generating fun
