On Sun, Nov 14, 2021, at 15:26, Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote:
> Oh, and yes, yapf does allow formatting only the diff. I agree that
> reformatting the entire code base is problematic.
That's a good point: it's possible to make these changes incrementally. There's
something called yapf-diff. It's in
Thanks to everyone who participated in the poll. Starting November 24th,
bi-weekly NumPy community meetings will be held at 7 pm GMT.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 9:10 PM Inessa Pawson wrote:
> It’s that time of the year again when most of us have to adjust our
> clocks. For some of us the fun doesn’
I've also used uncrustify for c/c++. Of course this plays hell with
revision control.
On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 6:29 PM Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote:
>
>
>
> On 15 Nov 2021, at 8:23 am, Stefan van der Walt wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2021, at 09:13, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
> The black formatter is
> On 15 Nov 2021, at 8:23 am, Stefan van der Walt wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2021, at 09:13, Charles R Harris wrote:
>> The black formatter is much improved in its latest version and I think good
>> enough to start using. The main drawbacks that I see are:
>> all operators, including '*' and '
An update on this: after discussion in the community meeting the preferred
direction is to add an `equal_nans` keyword and support both behaviors.
Given that we won't get to this, I proposed on
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/20326 to make the default False, i.e.
the same as for 1.21.x
Cheer
On Sun, Nov 14, 2021, at 09:13, Charles R Harris wrote:
> The black formatter is much improved in its latest version and I think good
> enough to start using. The main drawbacks that I see are:
> * all operators, including '*' and '/', get spaces around them,
> * very long strings are not broke
On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 at 19:51, Jeff Reback wrote:
>
> in pandas we did a one time conversion to using black (a while ago) for
> python (and recently added a cython formatter); we do also have automatic
> c/cpp linters as well
>
> we have precommit rules to enforce this (and runs on ci)
>
> since
On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 9:05 PM Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 11:49 AM Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 2:36 PM Aivar Annamaa
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Has it been decided to stop publishing win32 wheels for Python 3.10?
>>> Numpy 1.21.4 currently misses w
On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 11:49 AM Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 2:36 PM Aivar Annamaa
> wrote:
>
>> Has it been decided to stop publishing win32 wheels for Python 3.10?
>> Numpy 1.21.4 currently misses win32 wheel for Python 3.10 on PyPI. Is this
>> temporary?
>>
>> I'm confus
in pandas we did a one time conversion to using black (a while ago) for python
(and recently added a cython formatter); we do also have automatic c/cpp
linters as well
we have precommit rules to enforce this (and runs on ci)
since then we don’t have discussions about formatting anymore :)
woul
On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 11:40 AM Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 6:14 PM Charles R Harris <
> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> This post is for discussing the automatic code formatters for C/C++/*.py
>> that are now available. The current options, as I see th
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 2:36 PM Aivar Annamaa
wrote:
> Has it been decided to stop publishing win32 wheels for Python 3.10? Numpy
> 1.21.4 currently misses win32 wheel for Python 3.10 on PyPI. Is this
> temporary?
>
> I'm confused, because
> https://www.mail-archive.com/numpy-discussion@python.or
On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 6:14 PM Charles R Harris
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This post is for discussing the automatic code formatters for C/C++/*.py
> that are now available. The current options, as I see them, are
> clang-format (C/C++) and black (*.py, *.pyi, etc). Neither is perfect to my
> eye, but
Hi All,
This post is for discussing the automatic code formatters for C/C++/*.py
that are now available. The current options, as I see them, are
clang-format (C/C++) and black (*.py, *.pyi, etc). Neither is perfect to my
eye, but I think they are good enough at this point and would reduce amount
o
14 matches
Mail list logo
