On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 12:30 PM matti picus wrote:
> We are back in business with 100k credits.
> Matti
>
>
Thanks Matti.
Chuck
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@p
We are back in business with 100k credits.
Matti
On Fri, 31 Dec 2021 at 08:43, James Tocknell
wrote:
> I'll need to check with the other maintainers (see
> https://github.com/h5py/h5py/issues/2026), but I believe h5py
> shouldn't need the x86 builds any more (I'm less sure about the other
> syst
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 5:46 AM Andras Deak wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 1:36 AM Joseph Fox-Rabinovitz <
> jfoxrabinov...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wrote a reference implementation for a C ufunc, `isint`, which returns
>> True for integers and False for non-integers, found here:
>> h
Hey, Stefano!
The level of being pedantic is absolutely acceptable.
I don't question any of your arguments. They are all perfectly valid.
Except that I'd rather say it is ~29 seconds if measuring against 1970.
Leap seconds were introduced in 1972 and there were
a total of 27 seconds since then,
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 1:36 AM Joseph Fox-Rabinovitz <
jfoxrabinov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wrote a reference implementation for a C ufunc, `isint`, which returns
> True for integers and False for non-integers, found here:
> https://github.com/madphysicist/isint_ufunc.
>
Shouldn't we ke
