Hi all,
Our bi-weekly triage-focused NumPy development meeting is Wednesday,
February 23rd at 17:00 UTC (9:00am Pacific Time).
Everyone is invited to join in and edit the work-in-progress meeting
topics and notes:
https://hackmd.io/68i_JvOYQfy9ERiHgXMPvg
I encourage everyone to notify us of issue
On Tue, 2022-02-22 at 01:43 -0600, Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 Feb 2022, at 1:01 AM, Stefan van der Walt wrote:
> > it is easier to explain away `x + 1` behaving oddly over `x[0] + 1`
> > behaving oddly
>
> Is it? I find the two equivalent, honestly.
>
> > given that we pretend lik
Joe,
Could you show an example that you find inelegant and elaborate on how you
intend to improve it? It's hard to discuss without more specific
information.
- Joe
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022, 07:23 Joseph Bolton
wrote:
> Morning,
>
> My apologies if this deviates from the vision of numpy:
>
> I find
Morning,
My apologies if this deviates from the vision of numpy:
I find myself often requiring the indices and/or values of the top (or
bottom) k items in a numpy array.
I am aware of solutions involving partition/argpartition but these are
inelegant.
I am thinking of 1-dimensional arrays, but
