On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 10:51, Andrew Nelson wrote:
> There's a scipy issue on this that discusses how to reduce usage,
> https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/19006.
>
> Main points:
>
> - at the moment CI is run on PR and on Merge. Convert to only running on
> PR commits. I've just submitted a P
There's a scipy issue on this that discusses how to reduce usage,
https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/19006.
Main points:
- at the moment CI is run on PR and on Merge. Convert to only running on PR
commits. I've just submitted a PR to do this for numpy.
- add a manual trigger. Simple to achieve
With this I agree, this sounds like a more radical (in a good way) solution.
> So I think this is a feature request of "prepend", "append" in a convenient
> fashion not to ufuncs but to ndarray. Because concatenation is just pain in
> NumPy and ubiquitous operation all around. Hence probably we
> On 14 Aug 2023, at 15:22, john.daw...@camlingroup.com wrote:
>
>> From my point of view, such function is a bit of a corner-case to be added
>> to numpy. And it doesn’t justify it’s naming anymore. It is not one
>> operation anymore. It is a cumsum and prepending 0. And it is very difficult
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 4:19 PM Charles R Harris
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This is a heads up that we have already exceeded our allotment of free
> time on Cirrus CI. They are giving us a pass this month, but next month
> they will start enforcing the limits. That will impact both our testing and
> ou
Hi All,
This is a heads up that we have already exceeded our allotment of free time
on Cirrus CI. They are giving us a pass this month, but next month they
will start enforcing the limits. That will impact both our testing and our
releases. We have taken steps to reduce our use of Cirrus, but it c
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 2:44 PM wrote:
> > From my point of view, such function is a bit of a corner-case to be
> added to numpy. And it doesn’t justify it’s naming anymore. It is not one
> operation anymore. It is a cumsum and prepending 0. And it is very
> difficult to argue why prepending 0 to
> From my point of view, such function is a bit of a corner-case to be added to
> numpy. And it doesn’t justify it’s naming anymore. It is not one operation
> anymore. It is a cumsum and prepending 0. And it is very difficult to argue
> why prepending 0 to cumsum is a part of cumsum.
That is ba
