Hi Pieter,
Thanks for pointing this PR out. That certainly fixes the immediate problem
with the inconsistent print statements that I highlighted in my original
message.
It doesn't address the more fundamental problem, though, which is that the
default behavior is to represent the polynomial in
The NEP was merged in draft form, see below.
https://numpy.org/neps/nep-0055-string_dtype.html
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 2:36 PM Nathan wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I just opened a pull request to add NEP 55, see
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/24483.
>
> Per NEP 0, I've copied everything up to
