On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:50 PM Aaron Meurer wrote:
> Is there a way to make pickle not depend on the specific submodule
> that a class is defined in?
No. `Unpickler` somehow has to locate the class/reconstruction function. It
will have to use the name given by the `__reduce_ex__` during pickl
Is there a way to make pickle not depend on the specific submodule
that a class is defined in? Wouldn't this happen again if you ever
decided to rename _core.
The underscores in numpy._core._reconstruct don't actually do anything
here in terms of making the interface not public, and if anything, a
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 4:24 PM Mateusz Sokol wrote:
> Hi! Thank you for all your feedback this week!
>
> We have made a decision to take a less disruptive option that we
> considered and that came up in this discussion.
>
> We back out of the `NumpyUnpickler` class solution for reading pickles
>
Hi! Thank you for all your feedback this week!
We have made a decision to take a less disruptive option that we considered
and that came up in this discussion.
We back out of the `NumpyUnpickler` class solution for reading pickles
across major NumPy versions.
Instead, we will retain `numpy.core`
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 9:17 AM Peter Cock via NumPy-Discussion
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 6:32 PM Matthew Brett wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 at 00:55, Andrew Nelson wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 23:50, Matthew Brett wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 6:32 PM Matthew Brett
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 at 00:55, Andrew Nelson wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 23:50, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 11:49 AM Andrew Nelson
> wrote:
> >> Could you say more about why y
