If I recall correctly, people were building against the Numpy 2.0.0 release
candidates in particular. In hindsight keeping those on PyPI might have
been better. A formal NEP/SPEC seems a good idea.
Peter
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 6:20 PM matti picus wrote:
> I would prefer we never delete packages
This looks handy - I used the following to try it:
$ pip install -U ruff
$ ruff --preview --select NPY201 --fix
Happily nothing to address on the code baseI tried.
Thanks,
Peter
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 11:32 AM Mateusz Sokol wrote:
>
> Hi all!
>
> Some time ago we added a new rule to Ruff li
Hello all,
I imagine there are many people here using the black coding style as
implemented by the tool black, albeit with reservations about how it
lays out arrays by default (often therefore wrapped in a format off/on
block to exclude the array from automatic layout to allow for manual
column ba
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 6:32 PM Matthew Brett
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 at 00:55, Andrew Nelson wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 23:50, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 11:49 AM Andrew Nelson
> wrote:
> >> Could you say more about why y
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 12:35 PM Matteo Raso via NumPy-Discussion
wrote:
>
> P.S. I originally tried to send this message as an email, but it was instantly
> rejected because I'm not a list member. That's a pretty serious error for a
> public mailing list.
That's very normal on a mailing list. Ev
